This is a library catalog (LBY-2002) listing 16 documents published in 2002 and held in an archive related to Sea-Tac Airport and regional aviation policy. The collection covers topics including airport noise studies, FAA forecasts, wetland mitigation, water quality permits, and legal proceedings involving Section 401 and 404 environmental certifications for the airport. Each entry provides the document title, author or agency, publication date, and the date it was added to the archive.

Notes

A library catalog listing 16 documents published in 2002, covering topics including airport noise studies, FAA aerospace forecasts, salmon habitat conservation, national airspace communications, Sea-Tac Airport permitting, wetland mitigation, and aerospace industry reports. Documents are sourced from agencies including the FAA, US GAO, Army Corps of Engineers, Port of Seattle, and Washington State Department of Ecology. The catalog was revised on February 6, 2003.

Sidebar On/Off

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.

continue...

V V

Notes

Message