This is an invoice dated February 6, 2019, issued by the City of Burien to the City of SeaTac, addressed to Steve Pilcher, AICP, for $545.70. The charge represents the second quarterly payment (October 1 – December 31, 2018) under Interlocal Agreement Contract #18-A101, related to the SeaTac Airport Mitigation Program (SAMP). Payment of $545.70 was due by March 8, 2019, and was to be remitted to the City of Burien Finance Department.

Notes

Invoice #569 dated 02/06/2019 from City of Burien Finance to City of SeaTac (Attn: Steve Pilcher, AICP), billing $545.70 for Interlocal Agreement Contract #18-A101, described as ‘SAMP’ Payment #2 covering the period 10/1–12/31/18. Customer number 6. Due date 03/08/2019. Remittance address: City of Burien Finance, 400 SW 152nd St., Suite 300, Burien, WA 98166. Related to the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP) Four City Interlocal Agreement.

Sidebar On/Off

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.

continue...

V V

Notes

Message