TagPort Of Seattle(413)
-
Edmiston v. Port of Seattle – Public Records Act Complaint, September 29, 2022
1.1 On December 1, 2020, Seattle-King County Public Health issued its “Community Health and Airport Operations Related Noise and Air Pollution: Report to the Legislature in Response to Washington State HOUSE BILL 1109” (the “Public Health Report”). The Public Health Report specifically focused upon the community health impacts from Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (“Sea-Tac”), operated by the Port of Seattle (the “Port”). Among other things, the Public Health Report conducted a study on the population health impact of the SeaTac airport communities. The 96-page Public Health Report found significant rates of poor public health outcomes that became worse closer one lived to the airport. By way of example, the poor health outcomes addressed included lower life expectancy rates; higher rates of death -
Port of Seattle – Real Estate Strategic Plan, 2020
2020 REAL ESTATE STRATEGIC PLAN | August 2021 Introduction ..........................................................1 Market Context ....................................................2 Real Estate Principles .........................................7 Property Profiles and Strategies ...................17 Fishermen’s Terminal .................................. 18 Salmon Bay Marina ..................................... 21 Terminal 91, Pier 90 & Pier 91 .................... 23 Terminal 91- Uplands ................................. 24 Pier 90 & Pier 91 ............................................ 27 Harbor Marine Corporate Center ............. 29 Pier 69 ............................................................. 31 World Trade Center West ............................ 33 Portfolio Growth - Implementation ............35 APPENDIX .............................................................45 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Port Commissioners Port Leadership Port Real Estate Team Advisory Committee Members Introduction 2020 REAL ESTATE STRATEGIC PLAN | August 2021 PROJECT BACKGROUND & PURPOSE Heartland has been tasked with developing a Real Estate Strategic Plan (RESP) for the Port of Seattle (POS) with a focus on select properties from the Port’s portfolio of industrial and office assets. The analysis and strategy serve an update to the 2016 POS Real Estate Strategic Plan, which resulted in a series of property specific recommendations that the Port has been leveraging since that time. The updated RESP is designed to provide the POS with a strategy to effectively evaluate and manage its existing portfolio of real estate assets while also providing a framework for evaluating future real estate investments and acquisitions. APPROACH & METHODOLOGY Underwriting of and Evaluation of Assets Heartland initiated the effort with a thorough review of Port selected assets within the portfolio. This included development of comprehensive tenant and occupancy profiles and development of a portfolio level model to evaluate future lease turnover and overall… -
Port – Tree Removal Notice, September 6, 2002
At the direction of the Federal Aviation Administration, the Port of Seattle will be removing some trees that pose a danger for aircraft take-offs and landings near Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. The trees are located on property owned by the Port and the state to the west and south of Tyee Golf Course, near South 196th Street and South 196th Place. We expect the work to start on Sept. 16 and take up to four weeks to complete. If you have any questions, please contact Rachel Garson, Port of Seattle, at 248-6851 September 6, 2002 Notice of Tree Removal -
Triangle Associates Community Assessment (Executive Summary) 04/09/1982
Since our recent letter to you regarding presentation of our community assessment, plans have changed somewhat, and we will not be making the presentation pn April 13 as previously planned. Given the length of the report and the complexity of its findings and recommendations, we feel that the small amount of time available for presentation would not allow for adequate understanding or discussion of the contents. Also, unanticipated delays in printing the full report mean,that copies will not be available by April 13, making the presentation further inappropriate. We do expect the report to be ready for mailing within a week, however, so you should expect to receive it soon. A copy of the executive summary of the report is enclosed to give you a preview of the full document. Thank you once again for sharing your time and thoughts with us. We would certainly be glad to hear any comments you have after reading the report, as would Lynn Taylor, Port Public Information Director, whose department initiated the study and who will be working out a plan based on our recommendations. ~~tQ~~ Partner and Principal 100 COLMAN BUILDING • 811 FIRST AVENUE • SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104 • 206/583-0655 ' .. ,......_ .. ~ .. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A COMMUNITY ASSESSMENT FOR THE PORT OF SEATTLE PREPARED BY: PRINCIPALS: ASSISTANT: Triangle Associates Penelope Peabody Alice Shorett Nancy Harrison ·. ~ ... . • .' ·' EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Triangle Associates was retained by the Port of Seattle to assess the Port•s relationships… -
Port of Seattle memos pac tac 82.84
will be leaving on vacation January 27 and return the week of February 7. By that time you will have had a chance to review the matrix and we can schedule a meeting to address some of our concerns and raise alternatives for discussion. If you have a favorite time for a meeting as in the day of the week, or time (either daytime, afternoon or evening), please let me know. I would like to make this group as informal and yet aE productive as possible. Our goal is to have a series of alternatives ~aid out for the Policy Advisory Committee by the next meeting on March 23. admire your guruption for volunteering to a~sist in this task. We ' ll find it at times a little frustrating, but always interesting and challenging. Thank you. 0682i Enclosures cc: Policy Advi ory Committee Highline Co unity Council Zone III Committee >,,. ,.. . -~ ., .rl " .... ·~· ·{ ... • ...... ~-:- February :u,, '-lr. J~ck Lynch Otrcctor of "?l;mninr, a:1d Corm.untty !">~vclopnent t~1ng County> Court !!onse Seattle, 1~shin6ton 9810A Dear Jack: • ' At tho l<'IDt Policy AJvisory Gor.-<~r:tittC!e (PAC) «lflCt.ing a question ~=ts r.nisad rn~~a.rding the otBtllf' of l:in'1 Colnty building co~c sound insulAtion requ! r I!.~ en ts for t'ro tee tiotl frf>t.l aircr:1 ft ··~P.nernted not Gil• t:in~ Count~' rcpr(!Bfmt?..tivcs hAri infot-::.!ed PAC a fa-t yellrll ~tr,o of an invP.ctigation into th~ inplc''lCntnt!o!l of l;•tch a huildin .r; cot!o rgquirurumt. ~lowcver, the outcor.;e of… -
Port of Seattle Resolution 3042 (Flight Plan)
A RESOLUTION of the Port Commiss~on of the Port of Seattle authorizing the Executive Director to execute an Interagency Agreement with the Puget Sound Council of Governments to establish a planning process for developing a regional air carr~er system plan for the Puget Sound region. WHEREAS, the Puget Sound Council of Governments (hereinafter, the "PSCOG") has been designated by the Federal Government as the Metropolitan Planning Organization for the Puget Sound region for transportation planning; WHEREAS, ~n this capacity, PSCOG ~s responsible for the Regional Transportation Plan which guides land use and transportation policies throughout the Puget Sound region; WHEREAS, one element of the Regional Transportation Plan is the Regional Airport System Plan which was adopted by the PSCOG Assembly on September 29, 1988; WHEREAS, the Regional Airport System Plan identifies the need for additional air carrier capacity in the Puget Sound region to meet the long range air carrier demand; WHEREAS, the Port of Seattle (hereinafter the "Port") is responsible for operating Seattle-Tacoma International Airport, which has evolved as the major air carrier hub for the northwest reg~on of the United States; WHEREAS, on July 12, 1988, the Port Commiss~on reviewed recommendations of the Airspace Study Update calling for, first, a work program designed to increase the utilization of Sea-Tac's existing capacity and thereby provide for air traffic growth to approximately the year 2000; and second, a planning effort to study long term air carrier capacity requirements beyond the year 2000; WHEREAS, recognizing that the planning of the long…