TP Day 9: PCHB Hearing — Dr. William Stubblefield WER Range-Finding Toxicity Studies (AR 056666–056668)

This document is a transcript of legal proceedings in which attorneys and a hearing officer debate the admissibility of laboratory toxicity study documents related to water quality testing. An expert witness, Dr. Stubblefield, confirms familiarity with the range-finding WERS (Water Effect Ratio) studies, while opposing counsel raises hearsay objections. The hearing officer ultimately allows certain documents for background reference only, not as proof of the facts they contain.

Notes

Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) hearing transcript, pages 9-0060 through 9-0062 (AR 056666–056668), examining Dr. William Stubblefield (Ph.D.) under direct examination by Mr. Pearce. Testimony concerns port-generated documents presenting results of range-finding whole effluent response (WER) toxicity tests, including laboratory bench data sheets and a Parametrix memorandum (Exhibit 649). Hearsay objections raised by Mr. Stock (ACC) and Mr. Poulin; presiding officer Ms. Cottingham rules document admissible for background only, not for truth of the matter asserted, due to its draft nature. Dispute involves double/triple hearsay, indicia of trustworthiness, and foundation for expert reliance on WER ratio range-finding study data. Third runway EIS administrative record context; Port Of Seattle generated documents at issue.

V V