Notes

Pre-filed testimony of Dr. Peter Willing and Greg Wingard submitted on behalf of appellant Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) in PCHB No. 01-160, ACC & CASE v. Dept. of Ecology & Port of Seattle, filed February 22, 2002 with the Environmental Hearings Office. Binder 4 of 4 in a four-binder set. The full index (Binder 1) covers testimony of Amanda Azous on wetlands, Vacca Farm, SeaTac stream regulations, King County jurisdictional wetlands, and natural resources mitigation plan; testimony of Dr. Ed Kavazanjian on geotechnical issues including embankment fill, MSE retaining walls, and GeoSyntec comments related to the Third Runway at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. Case involves Sea-Tac Airport Third Runway construction, Pollution Control Hearings Board, AR 015130.

Sidebar On/Off

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.

continue...

V V

Notes

Message