This document package from ABCx2, LLC includes a consulting invoice for $7,750 billed to the County of Arlington (Invoice #1158, dated June 12, 2020, approved for payment July 5, 2020), along with a supplemental budget summary prepared by NowGEN as of May 31, 2020. The budget summary shows project expenditures across four components totaling $21,112.50 out of a $250,000 project budget, with the $7,750 supplement added to the June invoice. The materials appear to relate to NextGen aviation consulting services, which typically involve airspace modernization and flight procedure work relevant to airport noise policy planning.

Notes

Invoice from ABCx2, LLC to Rich Roisman at the County of Arlington for $7,750 in consulting services. The invoice is accompanied by a budget summary supplement prepared by NowGEN showing project expenditures through May 31, 2020, against a $250,000 project budget. The supplement notes the $7,750 increase to the June invoice.

Sidebar On/Off

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.

continue...

V V

Notes

Message