ABCx2, LLC submitted Invoice #1207 dated March 5, 2021, billing the County of Arlington $24,138.00 for consulting services, approved for payment on March 30, 2021. The accompanying project budget summary shows cumulative consulting work spanning May 2020 through February 2021 across five components (C1–C5), totaling $226,050.50 in costs out of a $250,000 project budget, leaving a remaining balance of $23,950.

Notes

Invoice #1207 from ABCx2, LLC to Rich Roisman at the County of Arlington for consulting services totaling $24,138.00, dated March 5, 2021 and approved for payment on March 30, 2021. The document includes an attached project budget summary showing consulting work billed across multiple periods from May 2020 through February 2021, broken down by five components (C1-C5) against a $250,000 project budget with $23,950 remaining. The consulting work appears related to NextGen aviation services based on the NowGEN branding on the supporting documents.

Sidebar On/Off

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.

continue...

V V

Notes

Message