July 24, 2019 1 pp.

Invoice 824: City of Burien to City of Des Moines — Interlocal Agreement #18-A101 SAMP Invoice #5 May 2019

This is an invoice dated July 24, 2019, from the City of Burien to the City of Des Moines billing $741.71 under Interlocal Agreement #18-A101, related to the 'SAMP' (Sea-Tac Airport Mediation Program) for the month of May 2019. The invoice, numbered 824, was due by August 23, 2019, and was addressed to Susan Cezar at Des Moines City Hall. It reflects a cost-sharing arrangement between the two cities under a formal interlocal agreement tied to Sea-Tac Airport noise policy efforts.

Open full document

Notes

Invoice #824 dated 07/24/2019 from City of Burien Finance Department to City of Des Moines (Attn: Susan Cezar), billing $741.71 under Interlocal Agreement #18-A101 for the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP), Invoice #5 covering May 2019. Due date 08/23/2019. Customer Number 3. Remittance address: 400 SW 152nd St., Suite 300, Burien, WA 98166.

Sidebar On/Off

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.

continue...

V V

Notes

Message