Notes

A cover letter from Port of Seattle Senior Environmental Program Manager Paul Agid to John Wietfeld of the Washington Department of Ecology, transmitting meeting minutes from the November 16, 2000 Ecology-Port meeting regarding the Seattle-Tacoma International Airport MTCA Ground Water Study under Agreed Order 97TC-N112. The enclosed memo summarizes discussions about the scope of the Agreed Order, contamination pathways, cleanup mechanisms, and the Port’s concern about potential future actions on sites showing no MTCA risks. Key topics include hydrogeologic study boundaries, receptor identification, and the use of VCP and Independent Actions for post-Order cleanup.

Sidebar On/Off

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.

continue...

V V

Notes

Message