November 15, 2000August 2, 2026

EXH AR017291: Email from Chung K. Yee to Kevin Fitzpatrick Regarding Sea-Tac Fill Dirt and MTCA Testing Requirements

Notes

Email dated November 15, 2000 from Chung K. Yee to Kevin Fitzpatrick regarding Sea-Tac fill dirt, specifically the ‘Black’ virgin site where soil samples exceeded Method B 100X groundwater standards under MTCA (Model Toxics Control Act). The site holds 200,000 to 300,000 cubic yards of fill and is workable during winter months. Beth Clark arranged a conference call with Paul Agid to discuss solutions; Yee proposed following MTCA testing requirements WAC 173-340-740(7)(e) and (f). AR 017291, Exhibit 19, M. Green.

Sidebar On/Off

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.

continue...

V V

Notes

Message