TagSea-Tac Communities Plan(236)

There is little question that some system is needed to assure that the implementation programs resulting from the Sea-Tac Communities Plan will be carried out. In fact, the need for some form of post project coordination was anticipated at the time of the initial grant application and was included as work item 15. 6. To develop the most effective system, a study along the following lines is suggested. OBJECTIVE: To assure continued, coordinated implementation of the program. PROGRAMS ANTICIPATED: In evaluating any 11 post project coordination" system, the basic question of what is to be coordinated must be answered. To a large extent, most of the implementation programs can now be described: 1. Noise improvement programs: a. Programs to reduce noise at the source will involve the Port of Seattle, Airlines, aircraft manufacturers, and the FAA. Programs will include both physical and operational changes. b. Programs which are applied to receivers · of noise will involve administration, on-going monitoring systems, complaint reception and processing, etc. Principal agencies will include the Port of Seattle and King County. Other agencies may include the FHA, KC Housing Authority and State Highway Department. 2. Drainage Programs: a. Implementation of the physical aspects of the drainage program will rest principally with the Port of Seattle and King County. • • Other related agencies may be involved, such as the State Highway Department, Metro, Corp of Engineers, etc. Emphasis will be in terms of carrying out capital improvement projects. b. Administration of land development controls to…

-:[_71 er-;-fir IJ C f tt IS i I )tthr Urban Development Committee Liaison 3) 4) Policy Advisory Committee Report alter- (TV) Report 5) Project update, forecasts and noise impact formula Ed Parks, Port of Seattle 6) Committee Purpose Statement 7) Other SPECIAL NOTE: Plans are to show the 'noise' TV program before the meeting at 7:30. Call the Community Office the day of the meeting if you would like to come early and view the program. development YOUR 2¢ WORTH Typical Discussion Q.uestions (to be perfect ed) Ls Sea-Tac and Its Neighbors If no new planning ls done and land use conditions are unchanged, who is paying for airport problems? Who might pay if changes are made? O.f what importance is the a1.rport to your cormmmi ty? Vr't1a.t should be the basis for deciding how Rig the airport should be? 1.Vhy? Do you feel there are any good uses for land heavily affected by airport noise? If sa wha. t are they and why? II. Urban Streams, A Hard Look What are all the values of a natural fatercourse to a community that you can thinin of? Which of these values or uses are the most importnat to you? V.~ich are of secondary importance? Which can be provided for by other means? How would things hB.ve to change or be changed, if the priori ties given by this group were to be applied? From the list of proposed altel.'nB.tives for jhese streams, which fit your priorities? Which would be…

' r" l • o , o I I • "" ' •' •' ' '" . . COI-1MISSlON AG ENDA September 7, 197 3 IT EM NO.--------=-=-<::...__ ___ _ TO Mr. J. Eldon Ophe im, Gene ral Manage r DATE O F ME E TING 9 ~/ /.,7 3 r»-7 FROM Dona ld G. Shay, Director of Aviation SUBJECT R e port and R e commendations re Inter i m Land A cquisition Sea-Tac Intern ationa l Airport Pursuant to directions is sued by the Commission June 12, 197 3 , the staff has made a study of the possibility and extent of an interim land acquisition program. Interim refers to that land acquisition which might be acc01nplished in accord with current Federal Aviation Administration policies and funding c a pabilities, Port o:f Seattle funding capabilities and further, a.nd importantly, that which does not purport to finally or totally answer those questions which are within the purvie w of the Sea-Tac Master Plan and Environs Study. In conside ring the ex tent of the land acquisition, we cons idered firs t that land which would be e ligible for FAA participation according to the stricte st int e rp r etation of their cm·rent regulations. This includes such areas o f l a nd wh-_ch may extend up to 1, 250 fee t late rally from the runway centerline, extending 5, 000 fe e t b eyond each end of th e primary surface. This would mean a northerly…

seaotac/ COiT'rrlUnitl8S p!aJ1 1 b ~ · • · a joint effort of the port of seattle and king county October 22, 1974 ' to: POLICY ADVISORY COMMITTEE from: Ed Parks, Technical Coordinator SUBJECT: PAC Meeting, Wednesday, November 6, 1974 Sea-Tac Passenger Terminal, Port of Seattle Offices AGENDA 1. Approval of Minutes, October 2, 1974 meeting 2. Study Progress 3. Conununity Involvement 4. Review of Airport Master Plan 5. Review of Composite sub-area Vicinity'?lans 6. Discussion of p:cesentation format & schedule 7. Establishment of a "follow-on" Community Plan effort 8. Other items 9. Next scheduled meeting, Tuesday, December 3, 1974 2:00 P.M. For further i~formation call Ed Parks @ 587-4630 - Shay - Yoshioka - Tracy - Sims - Berteig - Ycshioka - Schuh rxx t of sea tile r 0 l· ~"'X 1"0. ·g • ~eattle ~V. c·j•:-~g. tO'l ,J. , ) •' c... ' ~ ••' f.i,,) ;.! • I 98l11 (II tel: (206) 587- 4630

THE STUDY INVOLVES AN AREA OF 44.2 SQUARE MILES BOUNDED BY: NORTH - ROXBURY AND TRENTON STS.; EAST- FREEWAY AND 51ST SO.; SOUTH- SO. 288TH; AND WEST- PUGET SOUND. THIS IN- CLUDES ALL OF THE INCORPORATED CITIES OF NORMANDY PARK AND DES MOINES AND PORTIONS OF SEATTLE, TUKWILA -AND KENT. THE COMMUNITIES OF BURIEN AND WHITE CENTER ARE ALSO INCLUDED. THE 1970 CENSUS INDICATES A POPULATION OF 137,000 FOR THE STUDY AREA. INVENTORY - SCHOOLS: ELEMENTARY JR .HIGH SR.HIGH SPECIAL ADM & OTHER HIGHLINE #401 33 9 5 3 12 FEDERAL WAY #210 5 1 1 SOUTH CENTRAL #406 4 1 1 1 KENT #415 1 SEATTLE #1 1 HIGHLINE COMMUNITY COLLEGE IS ALSO IN THE STUDY AREA PARKS: IN ADDITION TO THE RECREATIONAL FACILITIES ASSOCIATED WITH EACH SCHOOL, KING COUNTY OWNS 18 PARK SITES IN THE AREA WITH SOME YET TO BE DEVELOPED. THESE RANGE IN SIZE FROM SEAHURST WITH 172.8 ACRES TO CHELSEA WITH ONLY 3.0 ACRES. THERE ARE ALSO PARKS WITHIN THE INCORPORATED CITIES AND SALTWATER STATE PARK OWNED BY WASHINGTON ~ STATE. THE COUNTY HAS 1 SWIMMING POOL IN OPERATION IN THE HIGHLINE SCHOOL DISTRICT WITH ANOTHER UNDER CONSTRUCTION IN THE SOUTH CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT. UTILITIES & SERVICES: WATER - 18 PUBLIC AGENCIES AND SOME PRIVATE WATER COMPANIES. SEWER - 10 PUBLIC AGENCIES FIRE - 13 PUBLIC AGENCIES WITH 17 FIRE STATIONS IN THE STUDY AREA TELEPHONE - 1 PRIVATE COMPANY ELECTRICAL - 1 PUBLIC AGENCY AND 1 PRIVATE COMPANY GARBAGE - 3 PRIVATE COMPANIES MISCELLANEOUS:…

DRAFT REPORT OF TilE LAND USE COMMITTEE SEA-TAC COMMUNITIE~ PLAN . ; ,. The assignment of the King County Pol icy Development Commission 1s Land Use Committee has been to monitor the Sea-Tac Communities ,Pian process and insure that appropriate levels of community involvement have been main- tained throughout. II. INTRODUCTION : A. PROJECTEftOBJECTIVES AND REQUIREMENTS In December of 1972, the Port of Seattle and King County applied for and received a grant of 640,000 dollars from the Fed era I Aviation Admi nistra- tion (FAA) to assist in the joint development of a master plan for the Sea-Ta,c International Airport and a companion plan for that portion of King County most directly affected by the Airport 1s presence and operation .. The following four . '. . . major objectives were identified: To concurrently develop a Comprehensive Master Plan for Sea- Tac International Airport and to develop an airport vicinity plan which together improved the relationships between the Airport and surrounding environs. To incorporate detailed environmental inventories into the study such that all relevant environmental factors are assured full and careful consideration. ) .. .. To proceed in a manner which fully addresses the advantages and disadvantages associated with each and every potential viable plan alternative and provide {or adequate public involvement in all such deliberation. To develop {ina/ recommendations soundly based on all pertinent technical, economic, social, environmental and financial factors, which provide {or the adoption of specific implementation policies on behalf of the Port of Seattle, King…

This report was funded in part by grant runber OOT- FA 73NW-0111 from the Plaming Grant Program as authorized by the Airport and Airways Developnent Act of 1970 map supplement to sixth month report 1· community trends and chacteristics 2·1and use 3· ground transportation and traffic 4·aesthetic and visual characteristics 5· natural determinants --------~-----~-~- - -- ! v: 1970 census tracts -0~--- King County 25.4 King County less Seattle 25.6 median age of population LEGEND under 20 to 25 & over community King County King County less Seattle 42.2 percent of persons under years of age LEGEND under 35% to 40% to 45% to 50 o/o 50% & over trends King County as King County less Seattle 5.1 @ percent of persons 65 years of age and older LEGEND under 5% to 9% to 13% to 17% 17% & over @ DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ENVIRONMENTAL DEVELOPMENT scale: one inc h equals 8,000 feet LAND USE MANAGEMENT DIVISION July , 1973 @ 1-1 Seattle population density (persons per acre} LEGEND under 3 to 5 to 7 to 9 @ @ & above it" community percent of population moving between 1965 & 1970 LEGEND under 40% to 50 o/o to 60% - 60 to 70o/o % and over trends King County 6.9 King County less Seattle 2.4 non-white population LEGEND under 2% to 4% 4% & over • DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ENVIRONMENTAL DEVELOPMENT scale: one inch equals 8,000 feet LAND USE MANAGEMENT DIVISION July,1973 @ 1-2 King County King County…

THE PROJECT. In March of 1973, the Port of Seattle Com- mission and the King County Council initiated a jointly sponsored study to develop a plan for the coordinated im- provement of Sea-Tac Internat ional Airport and surrounding communities . Based upon a detailed work program, and funded in part by a grant from the Federal Aviation Adminis- tration (FAA), the project was undertaken for the express purpose of determining how the Airport and its neighbors could best achieve maximum compatibility . The Sea-Tac Communities Plan, summarized by the text and exhibits that follow , represents the key end product of this important effort. THE AIRPORT. According to the latest published figures on passenger enplanements , Sea-Tac International Airport ranks as the 19th busiest air carrier airport in the United States. In 1974, a total of 5,772,216 passengers and 106,466 airline aircraft operations were handled by this public facility lo- cated in the southwestern part of King County some 15 miles south of Seattle . Starting from an in itial 906-acre site acquired by the Port of Seattle in 1942, the Sea-Tac Airport has been expanded and improved through the years to keep pace with the Pacific Northwest 's dynamic and specialized air travel market. Within its present boundary of 2,200 acres , the Airport now accom- modates a parallel runway airfield system ; a terminal com- plex designed to process up to 20 million passengers per year ; a computer-operated subway circulation network; and air cargo , aircraft maintenance,…