TagRv(3131)

• “The Port Commission hereby orders an assessment regarding the effectiveness of previously installed Port of Seattle funded noise insulation packages be conducted and concluded by the end of the year 2024. The assessment will involve extensive outreach, collection of information from property owners and analysis of that information.” • Authorized, tax levy-funded, budget of $6.5M with $5M of those funds being set aside for design/construction associated with the Pilot Program Pilot Program Schedule Survey Overview and Results • Designed to meet intent of Order 2024-04 • Pilot Steering Committee and Pilot Working Group composed of airport staff and consultants • Conducted within 2014 SEA Noise Remedy Boundary • Access to survey through unique QR code or unique URL assigned to residences’ addresses • Extensive outreach to community and stakeholders – Approx. 3,200 SFHs w/ pre-survey postcard and three mailings – Informational webpage on Port’s website – Survey assistance availability by Port staff via email and phone – Information station at three public Part 150 Study meetings in June – Regular updates at StART Aviation Noise Working Group meetings – Update provided at Highline Forum meeting Survey Overview and Results (cont.) • EDI integration – Translation of survey and mailed materials into Port’s Tier 1 and Tier 2 languages (six additional languages) – Physical copies of survey available upon request in seven languages – Added questions about race/ethnicity and income • Questions about number and types of common window/door concerns including operation and appearance from residents’ perspective Survey Overview and…

Subtitle B —Other Regulations Relating to Transportation Chapter VIII —National Transportation Safety Board Part 830 Notification and Reporting of Aircraft Accidents or Incidents and Overdue Aircraft, and Preservation of Aircraft Wreckage, Mail, Cargo, and Records Subpart A General § 830.1 Applicability. § 830.2 Definitions. Subpart B Initial Notification of Aircraft Accidents, Incidents, and Overdue Aircraft § 830.5 Immediate notification. § 830.6 Information to be given in notification. Subpart C Preservation of Aircraft Wreckage, Mail, Cargo, and Records § 830.10 Preservation of aircraft wreckage, mail, cargo, and records. Subpart D Reporting of Aircraft Accidents, Incidents, and Overdue Aircraft § 830.15 Reports and statements to be filed. PART 830—NOTIFICATION AND REPORTING OF AIRCRAFT ACCIDENTS OR INCIDENTS AND OVERDUE AIRCRAFT, AND PRESERVATION OF AIRCRAFT WRECKAGE, MAIL, CARGO, AND RECORDS Authority: 49 U.S.C. 1101-1155; Pub. L. 85-726, 72 Stat. 731 (codified as amended at 49 U.S.C. 40101). Source: 53 FR 36982, Sept. 23, 1988, unless otherwise noted. Subpart A—General § 830.1 Applicability. This part contains rules pertaining to: This content is from the eCFR and is authoritative but unofficial. (a) Initial notification and later reporting of aircraft incidents and accidents and certain other occurrences in the operation of aircraft, wherever they occur, when they involve civil aircraft of the United States; when they involve certain public aircraft, as specified in this part, wherever they occur; and when they involve foreign civil aircraft where the events occur in the United States, its territories, or its possessions. (b) Preservation of aircraft wreckage, mail, cargo, and records…

AN ACT Relating to increasing environmental justice by improving 1 government decisions; amending RCW 70A.15.2210; adding new sections 2 to chapter 43.21C RCW; and creating a new section.3 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:4 NEW SECTION. Sec. 1. The purpose of this act is to reduce the 5 disparities in cumulative environmental and health impacts in 6 Washington and improve the health of all Washington residents.7 NEW SECTION. Sec. 2. A new section is added to chapter 43.21C 8 RCW to read as follows:9 (1)(a) The department of ecology shall add environmental justice 10 as an element of the environment within WAC 197-11-444 and as a 11 component of the environmental checklist within WAC 197-11-960, as 12 those sections existed on the effective date of this section.13 (b) Upon the adoption of rules by the department of ecology, a 14 lead agency must, in implementing the requirements of this chapter, 15 consider environmental justice in a manner consistent with its 16 consideration of other elements of the environment within WAC 17 197-11-444.18 (2) For purposes of this section "environmental justice" has the 19 same meaning as in RCW 70A.02.010.20 S-0623.1 SENATE BILL 5380 State of Washington 69th Legislature 2025 Regular Session By Senators Lovelett, Trudeau, Hasegawa, Nobles, Saldaña, Stanford, and Valdez Read first time 01/21/25. Referred to Committee on Environment, Energy & Technology. p. 1 SB 5380 NEW SECTION. Sec. 3. A new section is added to chapter 43.21C 1 RCW to read as follows:2…

StART enhances cooperation between the Port of Seattle and the neighboring communities of Seattle-Tacoma International Airport SSttAARRTT AAGGEENNDDAA FEBRUARY 26, 2025; 5:00 PM – 7:00 PM Please see webinar appointment sent from Zoom MMeeeettiinngg OObbjjeeccttiivveess:: AA rreeppoorrtt oouutt oonn tthhee aasssseessssmmeenntt ccoommpplleetteedd ffoorr tthhee SSoouunndd IInnssuullaattiioonn RReeppaaiirr aanndd RReeppllaacceemmeenntt PPiilloott PPrrooggrraamm aanndd aa rreeccaapp ooff SSttAARRTT’’ss FFeebbrruuaarryy 1122 OOllyymmppiiaa DDaayy oonn tthhee HHiillll.. (Note: The facilitator will open the meeting at 4:45 pm for those who may want to test their technology and connection.) Time Item Lead Action 55::0000 ppmm WWeellccoommee o Meeting Management/Intros o Opening Comments Andrés Mantilla, Facilitator, Uncommon Bridges Lance Lyttle, StART Chair/SEA Managing Director, POS 55::1155 ppmm SSoouunndd IInnssuullaattiioonn RReeppaaiirr aanndd RReeppllaacceemmeenntt PPiilloott PPrrooggrraamm AAsssseessssmmeenntt Ryan McMullan, Noise Programs Senior Manager, POS Presentation/Q&A 66::1155 ppmm SSttAARRTT OOllyymmppiiaa DDaayy oonn tthhee HHiillll John Flanagan, State Government Relations Manager, POS Update 66::2200 ppmm AAvviiaattiioonn NNooiissee WWoorrkkiinngg GGrroouupp AAccttiivviittiieess Marco Milanese, Community Engagement Manager, POS Update 66::3300 ppmm SSuussttaaiinnaabbllee AAiirrppoorrtt MMaasstteerr PPllaann UUppddaattee Clare Gallagher, Capital Project Delivery Director, POS Update 66::4400 ppmm PPuubblliicc CCoommmmeenntt Public 66::5555 ppmm WWrraapp UUpp ++ NNeexxtt SStteeppss Andrés Mantilla, Facilitator, Uncommon Bridges 77::0000 ppmm AAddjjoouurrnn TENTATIVE NEXT MEET ING : APRIL 23, 2025 - 5:00 - 7:00 PM VIA ZOOM

0 0 S W F O U R T H AV E N U E , P O R T L A N D, O R E G O N 9 7 2 0 1 • 5 0 3 - 8 2 3 - 7 5 2 6 • w w w. p o r t l a n d o r e g o n . c o m / b d s PORTLAND INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT NOISE IMPACT OVERLAY ZONE CITY OF PORTLAND OREGON - BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES lu _z on in g_ ai rp or t_ no ise 1/ /1 Portland International Airport Noise Impact Overlay Zone Informational Packet for Residential Projects The purpose of this packet is to provide information and instructions for residential building permit applicants with property in the Portland International Airport Noise Impact Zone (City of Portland Zoning Code Chapter 33.470). Properties within this overlay zone are identified with an “x” on the City’s Official Zoning Maps. This packet includes the following information: • Purpose and Background • Noise overlay map • Permit Instructions • Aircraft Noise Easement form • Aircraft Noise Disclosure Statement form • Resources and Contacts Purpose and Background The Portland International Airport (PDX) Noise Impact Overlay Zone (“x” overlay zone) is intended to reduce the impact of aircraft noise on development within the noise impact area surrounding the Portland International Airport. It also promotes general economic welfare by protecting air transportation and aviation commerce. The “x” overlay zone was…

AN ACT Relating to increasing environmental justice by improving 1 government decisions; adding new sections to chapter 43.21C RCW; and 2 creating a new section.3 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:4 NEW SECTION. Sec. 1. The purpose of this act is to reduce the 5 disparities in cumulative environmental and health impacts in 6 Washington and improve the health of all Washington residents.7 NEW SECTION. Sec. 2. A new section is added to chapter 43.21C 8 RCW to read as follows:9 (1)(a) The department of ecology shall add environmental justice 10 as an element of the environment within WAC 197-11-444 and as a 11 component of the environmental checklist within WAC 197-11-960, as 12 those sections existed on the effective date of this section.13 (b) Upon the adoption of rules by the department of ecology, a 14 lead agency must, in implementing the requirements of this chapter, 15 consider environmental justice in a manner consistent with its 16 consideration of other elements of the environment within WAC 17 197-11-444.18 (2) In adopting rules to implement this section, the department 19 of ecology must identify standardized mitigation, which may include 20 H-1085.1 SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 1303 State of Washington 69th Legislature 2025 Regular Session By House Environment & Energy (originally sponsored by Representatives Mena, Berry, Reeves, Reed, Ormsby, Salahuddin, Ramel, Pollet, Nance, Doglio, and Scott) p. 1 SHB 1303 best management practices, for potential adverse environmental 1 impacts to environmental justice. When implemented, the standardized 2…

AN ACT Relating to reducing environmental and health disparities 1 and improving the health of Washington state residents in large port 2 districts; and adding a new chapter to Title 53 RCW.3 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:4 NEW SECTION. Sec. 1. The definitions in this section apply 5 throughout this chapter unless the context clearly requires 6 otherwise.7 (1) "Cumulative environmental health impact" has the same meaning 8 as in RCW 70A.02.010.9 (2) "Environmental benefits" has the same meaning as in RCW 10 70A.02.010.11 (3) "Environmental harm" has the same meaning as in RCW 12 70A.02.010.13 (4) "Environmental impacts" has the same meaning as in RCW 14 70A.02.010.15 (5) "Evidence-based" has the same meaning as in RCW 70A.02.010.16 (6) "Overburdened communities" has the same meaning as in RCW 17 70A.02.010.18 (7) "Qualifying port district" means a port district authorized 19 to undertake programs for the abatement of aircraft noise under RCW 20 53.54.010.21 H-1300.1 HOUSE BILL 1948 State of Washington 69th Legislature 2025 Regular Session By Representatives Santos, Thai, Parshley, Pollet, Obras, and Macri Read first time 02/11/25. Referred to Committee on Local Government. p. 1 HB 1948 (8) "Significant port action" means any action involving a 1 capital improvement project, purchase, or construction of $8,000,000 2 or more in value or any action that increases the number of gates at 3 an airport.4 (9) "Vulnerable populations" has the same meaning as in RCW 5 70A.02.010.6 NEW SECTION. Sec. 2. (1) A qualifying port…

[ ] Parks, Recreation & Senior Services ____ [ ] Public Works ____ APPROVED BY CITY MANAGER FOR SUBMITTAL: ____________ Purpose and Recommendation The purpose of this agenda item is for the Council to consider establishing an Airport Committee that will advise the Council on matters requiring decisions and/or actions related to airport issues. Suggested Motion Motion: “I move that the City Council approve the formation of the Airport Advisory Committee as outlined in the agenda item.” /s/ TG Discussion Item #3 Page 43 of 76 Background The City Council voted unanimously at the October 24, 2024 meeting to establish an Airport Committee. The Committee will provide recommendations to the City Council regarding airport-related issues. This Committee will be tasked with evaluating key topics, ensuring community involvement, and advising the Council on decision-making processes related to the airport. Discussion Based on the initial discussion, the following is a draft for consideration by the City Council regarding this item at the February 6, 2025 meeting. 1. Committee Purpose: The Committee shall serve in an advisory capacity to the City Council, providing recommendations and advice on the following topics related to airport matters: o Examination of the SAMP (Sustainable Airport Master Plan) timeline and responses to the process o Formation of an Interlocal Agreement (ILA) with airport partners and the extent of interaction with those partners o Selection and contracting of a consultant to assist with relevant projects o The role of the City of Des Moines on the StART (Seattle-Tacoma Airport…

• Context - the Airport/SAMP/EA Situation Today: bad/good • Committee 2.0 – threshold questions • Recommendations Page 70 of 76 Quiet Skies Puget Sound: Aviation Committee 2.0 Comments Context: what’s bad • SAMP draft Environmental Assessment (EA): 87,000 more annual flights carry catastrophic public health consequences to children, elderly, social and environmental justice communities • EA – reflects 4600 pages of no meaningful Port collaboration or mitigation • EA evidences StART, Highline Forum are “box checks” as far as airport expansion concerned • To observers, not clear council on same page as to gravity of the impacts of airport expansion on our public health and environment. Page 71 of 76 Quiet Skies Puget Sound: Aviation Committee 2.0 Comments Context: what’s good • Opposition to SAMP lining up – EPA, cities, growing number of advocacy groups • Federal representative Adam Smith’s office • State level • District Senators, Reps historically terrific • Growing numbers of advocacy groups engaged • Legal/regulatory framework positive for push back • FAA outdated science regulations being questioned Page 72 of 76 Quiet Skies Puget Sound: Aviation Committee 2.0 Comments Threshold Questions Framing Committee 2.0 • Question #1: Does City believe the available science and studies have established the public health harms from aviation noise and pollution? • Question #2: Based on SAMP EA, do we all agree there is no remaining evidence-based reason to believe the Port will voluntarily limit its own expansion, even knowing of these harms to public health? • Question #3: Will this…

Bill Number: 1303 HB Title: Environmental Justice Multiple Agency Fiscal Note Summary Estimated Cash Receipts Agency Name 2025-27 2027-29 2029-31 GF-State Total GF-State GF-StateTotal TotalNGF-Outlook NGF-Outlook NGF-Outlook 524,000 0 398,000 0 158,000 Office of Attorney General Non-zero but indeterminate cost and/or savings. Please see discussion.Department of Ecology Total $ 0 524,000 0 398,000 0 158,000 0 0 0 2025-27 Total GF- State Total 2029-31 TotalGF- State 2027-29Agency Name GF- State Local Gov. Courts No fiscal impact Loc School dist-SPI Local Gov. Other Local Gov. Total Agency Name 2025-27 2027-29 2029-31 FTEs GF-State Total FTEs FTEsGF-State GF-StateTotal TotalNGF-Outlook NGF-OutlookNGF-Outlook .0 Administrative Office of the Courts .0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 1.8 Office of Attorney General 524,000 1.4 0 398,000 .6 0 158,000 0 0 0 .0 Department of Commerce .0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 Department of Transportation Non-zero but indeterminate cost and/or savings. Please see discussion. 1,903,248 4.6 Department of Ecology 1,903,248 4.6 1,826,248 1,826,248 4.6 1,626,248 1,626,248 1,626,248 1,826,248 1,903,248 Department of Ecology In addition to the estimate above,there are additional indeterminate costs and/or savings. Please see individual fiscal note. State Parks and Recreation Commission Non-zero but indeterminate cost and/or savings. Please see discussion. 1,088,000 2.6 Department of Fish and Wildlife 1,088,000 2.6 1,060,000 1,060,000 2.6 1,050,000 1,050,000 1,050,000 1,060,000 1,088,000 17,834,100 39.8 Department of Natural Resources 17,834,100 43.0 18,106,000 18,106,000 43.0 18,106,000 18,106,000 18,106,000 18,106,000 17,834,100 Department of Natural Resources In addition to the estimate above,there are additional indeterminate costs and/or…