TagNorth Sea-Tac Park(91)

WdWYc tJ tIIL flr6L mabrtA of the arnryIiLtce {or Nora #alkak The steering cmnittee is a group of individuals whose Hujor responsibility is to uuintain ur opal mind to represalt the CmMlity. The cmmittee is a vital camILalication link between the public and the calsultalts , Jongeju1/Gerrard/Associates . The maibers of the cmdttee will _b4ve to luke choices about the progrm for the park based on disscussions with their neighbors and infmution about the natural md social potaltia:L of the site . The resFnnsibilicy for presulting that infonntion lies with Jangejan/Gerrard/Associates . The consultnlt 's role is to provide uwirormltal md social analysis , idurtify the uwiramnal urd social carryirlg capacity of the site and t:hUI develop a nnster plzr for North Sea Tac Park based on the uulysis, public input, Port, County, md FAA recmuuldations . The final nnster plur will not reflect everyone 's initial desires , but should be the -best solution to answer the needs of the cmnmlity and the awirorrmrt . Ruth of hat fibIb FEz&y Of the seven replies recieved, faw were in favor of a 18 hole golf cause , Male two were @posed to a golf facility. IMo people mntioned the need for the pla1 to appeal to a variety of age grows . Che person suggested a greenbelt or tree fann Mile alother preferred a very active facility. We recieved telephare rai lusts for bocce aId a passive park. There were too few replies to nuke uly sort of statistical judgamlts.…

North Clear Zone Advisory Committee ( July 10 , 1979) NAIa Gustaf Anderson Gary Filcher Tm Haynes Ted Hartung Ruth Hurt Bev Kessack OlaMae Crawford Gaylord Rose Carolyn Logan Anny Mohr Kathryn Tau$chy Lee Atwood Jeanne Zalud L + Re Schumacher Rick GIlmore Virginia Dana Geri VanNotric Jodi Cabreros Tony Scoccolo Kathi Hand Nita Price Rick Lente lbrothy Laird Gerald Pe SCOtt Cally Leighton Ken Becker Mark Casebolt John Kreiss Lenore Holmes Bill Holmes Mo rr iS Te Robinson Alfred de-Leest Ted Juan Marian Je Belt Carolyn Sanders Robert Revia Beverly M, Egan Peggy Rus Dottie Harper Forrest Dinwiddie D41 ADDRESS 1648 s. 130th 1426 S. 130th 12260 Des Moines Way 3102 s, 148th 13434 10th Ave, S, 13047 24th Ave , S, 13309 Des Moines Way 12443 12th Ave, S, 633 S,W, 152nd 2606 s, 150th 13023 22nd Avee S, 2040 S, lz+2nd 2831 S, 221st 11423 20th Ave , S, 823 s, 12Z,th 2648 s. 142th 17023 3 4th Ave , S, 16639 51st Ave, S, 2847 S, 152nd 560 s, 158th 902 s. 138th 14430 31st Ave, S, 0 s + 14 8th 3510 s. 180th 1032 S e 16 Oth 456 S , 162nd 15433 12th Ave. Se 11812 23l:d Ave, S, 1802 S, 132nd 1802 Se 132nd 13635 Des Moines Way 13223 Des Moines Way 2605 Se 14 6th 1029 s. 150th 2214 s, 120th 13400 6th Ave , S, 2802 s. 146th 2415 s. 144th 1626 s.w. 156th 12453 12th Ave, S, Se Se…

second meetinq of t he rlc rtt1 Cle3r Zone ?.ec-re~ti o 'l Plan Adv·lsory Cor:rnHte~e _t... 1 held in the Hichlir.~ Cormu~lity Center at 6 P. f.l . on AugrJSt 2nd, 1979. ' ~ . I ,, The agenda of the ~ceting was as follows: Earthworks Introductio11 FAA Golf ATV Break Sunset Jr. High SwiiTiilinq Passive Parks Other Elect Chairperson The meeting was called to order by Dave McNe~, of JonnPjan, Gerrarrl ftnd A~lOC1ates who introduced :~ary fi iss, an artist, from ;lew York, who explained Earthworks .trt to the cor.m ittee. t'.ary is oreparinq a rrroposal to be presented August 18, 1979 at the Seattle Art t1useum regardin(] a site at t he west side of the airport (on aoprox. 12th So. & l72nd St.) There is a natural eve appealinq site which would reclaim the area for a site to visit and observe the take-off and !andinrt of planes. The pro- posal will include walks, benches and terraces. Tne Eart hworks Art is a ~ational Pilot Proqram ~/hereby artists take into considerat1on Rock Pits, Enviro~ental Analy- sis Reports and Landsca~e and reconstruct the area to a functional site normally at a much lower cost t'lan a recla rr'.ation project. It was pointed out that previous plans included an Interpetive Center be provided in this area. The question re- garding funding was ask~d of Mary. ~hen the prooosal is made and agreed to there are various funding agents for this type of project. It is possible to apply to…

FINDING & PURPOSE. Citizens residing near airports are often exposed to noise at levels that interfere with certain activities and may be exposed to noise levels that may be hazardous to health. The purpose of the act is to ensure that proprietors of publicly owned airports have the authority to regulate airport noise and to prohibit residential communities from being exposed to excessive levels of that noise. DEFINITIONS. REGULATORY AUTHORITY. A local government that is the proprietor of an airport may, in its proprietary capacity, control the use of the airport for the purpose of limiting noise from airport activities and from related flight operations conducted outside the federally controlled navigable airspace. Such control may include: (1) limiting or prohibiting the use of the airport by all aircraft that cause a certain level of noise or vibration, or (2) limiting the ~ime of day of airport use:~ Regulations establishing such controls shall be reasonable, nonarbitrary and nondiscriminatory. The authority granted by this section is supplementary to other existing authorities. NOISE LIMIT. Noise from airport activities and related flight operations may not cause the community noise level (a daytime average level) in a residential community to exceed 65 decibels. ACTIONS REQUIRED. Local governments operating or providing ai~ ports with more than 30 scheduled flights per day shall take actions to ensure that section 4 is not violated. The actions taken shall also reflect the need for reducing airport and related noise during evening and nighttime hours relative to daytime hours. CODIFICATION.…

Since our recent letter to you regarding presentation of our community assessment, plans have changed somewhat, and we will not be making the presentation pn April 13 as previously planned. Given the length of the report and the complexity of its findings and recommendations, we feel that the small amount of time available for presentation would not allow for adequate understanding or discussion of the contents. Also, unanticipated delays in printing the full report mean,that copies will not be available by April 13, making the presentation further inappropriate. We do expect the report to be ready for mailing within a week, however, so you should expect to receive it soon. A copy of the executive summary of the report is enclosed to give you a preview of the full document. Thank you once again for sharing your time and thoughts with us. We would certainly be glad to hear any comments you have after reading the report, as would Lynn Taylor, Port Public Information Director, whose department initiated the study and who will be working out a plan based on our recommendations. ~~tQ~~ Partner and Principal 100 COLMAN BUILDING • 811 FIRST AVENUE • SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104 • 206/583-0655 ' .. ,......_ .. ~ .. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A COMMUNITY ASSESSMENT FOR THE PORT OF SEATTLE PREPARED BY: PRINCIPALS: ASSISTANT: Triangle Associates Penelope Peabody Alice Shorett Nancy Harrison ·. ~ ... . • .' ·' EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Triangle Associates was retained by the Port of Seattle to assess the Port•s relationships…

• A Council Request Form was submitted in on July 12, 2021, to re-open dialogue regarding the City taking ownership of the entire North SeaTac Park. • Joint working group from the Port of Seattle and the City have been meeting to explore topics around the feasibility and data collecting related to park ownership issues. • Mayor Simpson request of a resolution to support the CRF in the acquisition of North SeaTac Park . NEXT STEPS • Port of Seattle will bring forward for discussion to JAC on March 18, 2022 • City staff will bring a Resolution for consideration to Parks and Recreation Committee at the April meeting for review with a recommendation to forward to full City Council for full support. • Joint working group will continue to meet. QUESTIONS? Slide Number 1 PRESENTATION OVERVIEW CURRENT LEASES BACKGROUND NEXT STEPS QUESTIONS?