• 2024-07-11 00:43

    SEATTLE-TACOMA INTERNATIONAL (KSEA) Runway Information Seattle, WA

    Runway Information for SEATTLE-TACOMA INTERNATIONAL Airport (SEA) 16L/34R 16C/34C 16R/34L ID Dimensions Surface Weight Bearing Capacity 16L/34R 11901 ft x 150 ft / 3627.4 m x 45.7 m Bituminous Concrete (grooved), Excellent Condition Single Wheel 120.0 Double Wheel 250.0 Double Tandem 550.0 Dual Double Tandem 1120.0 16L/34R Details Title 16L 34R Latitude 47-27-49.6628N 47-25-52.2202N Longitude
  • 2019-07-26 01:38

    A Letter To Fred Felleman re: Glide slope and noise monitoring

    Mr. Felleman is a Commissioner of The Port Of Seattle. This letter is in response to a recent addition to the Port’s SAMP Near-Term Projects List, which was part of the Unanimous Consent Agenda (3c) Port Special Meeting in Kirkland, WA on 23 July 2019. Dear Commissioner, Thank you for adding in an update to
  • 2019-03-01 16:35

    Priorities

    I attended my first StART meeting in a while last night. The first thing I noticed was how ‘official’ it has become. By that I mean, it was sparsely attended, quiet and the attendees were engaged in some very fine-grained the work, mostly on the whole Glide Slope thing. The second half of the meeting
  • 1975-02-02 14:38

    Port of Seattle – Noise Remedies (PARKS/850/14/10)

    In keeping with the goal of achieving a compatible relationship between the airport and the surroundIng comunity, the noise exposur:e study has conducted a thorough measurement and analysis of Sea-Tac 's probleras . Details of this study are described under ENVIRONMENT. Objectives have been to (1) minimize noise at the source directly through local programs where possible, (2) to accurately identify and use source reduction pro- grams that are occurring nationwide, and (3) to apply a complete set of community-based remedies directly in the neighborhoods affected signif i-. cantly by noise exposure, Such programs are designed to deal with the residual problem not resolvable at the source, e As indicated in the noise exposure studies, time is an important factor. Noise exposure is presently at a peak level and will be decreasing through source changes (engine retro-fitting, increasing use of new air- craft , modified operating procedures, etc, ) . Thus , programs must be applied that deal with anticipated long-term duration of exposure. In addition, as the exposure studies indicate, reaction to noise is a highly subjective matter . Annoyance is a complex nix of factors attributable both to the noise Itself as a prhnary component and to ttsecondary com.- ponents'1 that are also present. These '1secondary components" include difficulty in selling property, concern over property value, fear of increasing ,noise, fear of neighborhood deterioration, uncertainty in planning for home improvements and repairs and many other similar con- cel:ns e @ PARKS / 850/14/02 The following noIse programs have…