Notes

Motion in limine filed by Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) in PCHB No. 01-160 before the Pollution Control Hearings Board for the State of Washington, seeking exclusion of prefiled and hearing testimony from Ecology witness Dave Garland. ACC argues Ecology failed to disclose Garland’s March 6, 2002 memo reviewing Pacific Ground Water Group (PGG) embankment modeling for the Port of Seattle’s December 2001 Low Stream Flow Analysis and Summer Low Flow Impact Offset Facility Proposal. Garland deposition taken January 9, 2002; interrogatories served November 28, 2001; Ecology counsel Tom Young involved; Ann Kenny referenced; Dr. Lucia cited as ACC expert; Rachael Paschal Osborn is ACC counsel at Helsell Fetterman.

Sidebar On/Off

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.

continue...

V V

Notes

Message