Flying Food Fare operates a flight kitchen and office facility at 2300 S. 154th Street in SeaTac, WA, under a non-aeronautical ground lease (#000086) covering approximately 90,114 square feet at the north end of Sea-Tac Airfield. The lease, which expired in March 2018, included two renewal options extending until 2028, each lasting five years. The tenant-owned building spans roughly 34,199 square feet, with space divided between office and warehouse functions, and any modifications to the property's use require review of bond and Airport Improvement Project (AIP) funding restrictions.

Notes

This document provides lease and building information for Flying Food Fare located at 2300 S. 154th Street in SeaTac, WA. It details lease #000086 covering 90,114 sq. ft. with an expiration date of 03/31/2018 and renewal options until 2028. The document also includes an aerial map showing the property boundary in relation to the airfield and neighboring tenants.

Sidebar On/Off

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.

continue...

V V

Notes

Message