This map provides a general reference overview of the commercial zone at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (Sea-Tac), showing Port of Seattle lease boundaries and property lines as of December 2014. It identifies key facilities including cargo buildings, hardstands, fuel facilities, airline maintenance areas, a rental car facility, and ground transportation lots. The aerial photo, taken in Spring 2012, covers the area bounded by SR-518, International Boulevard, and surrounding streets south of the airfield.

Notes

An aerial map of the commercial zone at Sea-Tac Airport showing Port of Seattle lease boundaries, property designations, and tenant locations including cargo facilities, fuel facilities, hardstands, and ground transportation areas. The map identifies named tenants such as FedEx, Alaska Cargo, Horizon Air, SeaTac Fuel Facilities LLC, Certified Aviation Services LLC, and others. The aerial photo was taken in spring 2012 and published December 31, 2014.

Sidebar On/Off

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.

continue...

V V

Notes

Message