September 8, 2026 571 pp.

Notes

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals case 26-3812, City of Oak Hill, TN, Course Correct Nashville, Crieve Hall Neighborhood Association Inc., and Ms. Kelly Insana v. FAA. Petition received 09/04/2026, docketed 09/08/2026. Originating case JO 7400.2R. Case opening letter from Clerk Kelly L. Stephens addressed to FAA Office of the Chief Counsel (Russell Christensen, William McKenna) and petitioners’ counsel William L. Penny of Thompson Burton, Nashville. Deadlines for appearance of counsel, disclosure of corporate affiliations, and bar admission set for September 22, 2026.

Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

Port of Seattle Regular Commission Meeting September 22, 2026
Add to CalendarMTuesday Sep 22: 12:00pm
17801 International Blvd, Seattle, WA 98158

Order of Business 10:30 a.m. 1. Call to Order 2. Executive Session – if necessary, pursuant to RCW 42.30.110 (executive sessions are not open to the public) 12:00 p.m. – Public Session Reconvene or Call to Order and Pledge of Allegiance 3. Approval of the Agenda 4. Special Orders of the Day 4a. Presentation of
[...]
Highline Forum Agenda – September 23, 2026
Add to CalendarMWednesday Sep 23, 2:30pm - 4:30pm
City of Des Moines, Police Services Building,

Highline Forum Agenda Theme: Part 150 Update and PortJobs Overview 2:30pm – Convene Meeting/Introductions Port Co-Chair, Commissioner Mohamed 2:35pm – Public Comments Audience The meeting will be held in person and virtually. Those wishing to provide public comment may: 1) Deliver public comment via email; 2) Deliver public comment via Microsoft Teams; or 3) Deliver
[...]

[See all...]

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.

continue...

V V

Notes

Message