EXH0030017487

PCHBPollution Control Hearings Board of the State of Washington

Subject: RE: Draft Language for Clean Fill Criteria in 401 Certification " DELIBERATIVE DOCUMENT CURRENTLY EXEMPT FROM PUBLIC DISCLOSURE Below are my comments on the draft. E6. It sounds like we are allowing the Port to use problem fill as long as the Port notify Ecology. I think the second sentence should exclude the use of inappropriate fill that may result in any potential impacts to waters of the state. E7c.2.(b) Should include appropriate EPA databases and the first list should read as "Confirmed & Suspected Contaminated Sites Report" E7c.2.(e) "The fill material shall be analyzed for the potential contaminant(s) identified in the environmental site assessment. At a minimum, fill material from all sites shall be analyzed for TPH and Priority Pollutants metals for compliance with MTCA method A soil cleanup levels." In the absence of MTCA method A soil cleanup levels, the potential contaminants shall comply with MTCA method B "100 X Groundwater" soil cleanup levels." The sampling frequency.. qee if you want to add E7c.2.(f) after the sampling requirement table. This is a repeat of a sort since .he term "environmental professional" is already used in couple of places. (f) All work shall be performed by an environmental professional, with appropriate training, experience and expertise in environmental site assessment. E7c.3. I don't think they know where the placement location yet. The location should be included in the as-builts to be submitted quarterly. ..... Original Message ..... From: Fitzpamcl£ Kevm Sent: Thurs0ay. August 24. 2000 3:22 PM To: Luster.…
V V