Notes

The Port of Seattle filed a response to the motion to intervene by Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) in PCHB Case No. 01-160, where Airport Communities Coalition appealed against the Department of Ecology and the Port of Seattle. The Port does not oppose CASE’s intervention but requests three specific limitations: no new issues beyond those already stipulated, adherence to the existing Pre-Hearing Order and discovery schedules, and no additional witnesses or exhibits beyond those already listed by existing parties. The document was transmitted via facsimile to multiple parties including the Pollution Control Hearings Board.

Sidebar On/Off

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.

continue...

V V

Notes

Message