PCHB Doc 01-160: Port Of Seattle’s Response to ACC and CASE Motion to Strike the Port’s Pre-Hearing Brief

Notes

Port Of Seattle’s response filed March 15, 2002 to Appellants’ motion to strike the Port’s pre-hearing brief in PCHB No. 01-160. Port argues the Board should deny the motion, noting that ACC and CASE jointly filed a 60-page brief by combining their page allowances and used 117 single-spaced 10-point footnotes containing substantive argument to circumvent the 30-page limit. Port defends its use of 24-point line spacing as standard double-spacing consistent with Civil Rules. Counsel of record include Linda J. Strout, Traci M. Goodwin (Port Of Seattle), Roger A. Pearce, Steven G. Jones (Foster Pepper & Shefelman PLLC), Jay J. Manning, and Gillis E. Reavis (Brown Reavis & Manning PLLC). Respondents are State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle; Appellants are Airport Communities Coalition and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion.

V V