August 1, 1994August 2, 2026

EXH AR037430: EPA Water Quality Standards Handbook: Second Edition — Appendix L, Interim Guidance on Determination and Use of Water-Effect Ratios for Metals

Notes

EPA Water Quality Standards Handbook, Second Edition (EPA-823-B-94-005a), August 1994, published by the EPA Office of Water (4305). Includes Appendix L: Interim Guidance on Determination and Use of Water-Effect Ratios for Metals, and a February 22, 1994 memorandum (EPA-823-B-94-001) from Tudor T. Davies, Director, Office of Science and Technology, to Water Management Division Directors Regions I-X and State Water Quality Standards Program Directors. Memorandum addresses use of water-effect ratio (WER) in water quality standards, site-specific criterion adjustment, EPA review and approval/disapproval, and implementation of the National Toxics Rule. Background references Water Quality Standards Handbook 1983 and three site-specific criteria procedures. Administrative Record number AR037430.

Sidebar On/Off

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.

continue...

V V

Notes

Message