Notes

Paul S. Fendt, a stormwater engineer with Parametrix Inc., provides a second declaration in the Pollution Control Hearings Board case between Airport Communities Coalition and the Department of Ecology and Port of Seattle. The declaration addresses claims about the Port’s control over retrofitting the stormwater system at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport, detailing the Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan’s provisions for peak flow control and water quality best management practices. Fendt also explains the modification of Condition J.1.c in Ecology’s revised §401 Certification to allow flexibility in coordinating the retrofit schedule with new MPU construction.

Sidebar On/Off

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.

continue...

V V

Notes

Message