Notes

Northwest Hydraulic Consultants, retained by the Airport Communities Coalition, writes to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers identifying inconsistencies in the Port of Seattle’s proposals for site development and stormwater management at Sea-Tac Airport. The letter presents two main comments: that proposed future land use development at borrow pit areas contradicts the Port’s justification for ignoring those conditions in the Stormwater Management Plan, and that the Natural Resource Mitigation Plan reverts to an old stormwater management proposal relying on Regional Detention Facilities not examined in the current SMP.

Sidebar On/Off

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.

continue...

V V

Notes

Message