Notes

Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and Citizens Against SeaTac Expansion (CASE) oppose the Department of Ecology’s motion in limine seeking to exclude Thomas R. Luster from testifying as an expert witness. The opposition argues that WAC 371-08-475(7) does not apply because Luster had no active role in reviewing the Port of Seattle’s 401 Certification application and was not retained as an expert witness on behalf of any party. The filing further contends that Ecology and the Port waived any right to object to Luster’s appearance.

Sidebar On/Off

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.

continue...

V V

Notes

Message