A Facebook post by Quiet Skies Puget Sound shares findings from a public disclosure request regarding public comments on SB 5955 (Port of Seattle levy), addressed to the Senate Ways and Means Committee on February 2, 2024. The post highlights that 375 CON comments included 357 non-King County residents not impacted by the levy, and requests the committee limit future comments to impacted residents; signed by Beacon Hill Council Chair Maria Batayola, Quiet Skies Puget Sound Chair Sheila Brush, former Rep. Velma Veloria, and Seattle Aviation Team Leads Dr. Laura Gibbons and Brandon Bowersox-Johnson.

Notes

A Facebook post by Quiet Skies Puget Sound shares findings from a public disclosure request regarding public comments on SB 5955 (Port of Seattle levy), addressed to the Senate Ways and Means Committee on February 2, 2024. The post highlights that 375 CON comments included 357 non-King County residents not impacted by the levy, and requests the committee limit future comments to impacted residents; signed by Beacon Hill Council Chair Maria Batayola, Quiet Skies Puget Sound Chair Sheila Brush, former Rep. Velma Veloria, and Seattle Aviation Team Leads Dr. Laura Gibbons and Brandon Bowersox-Johnson.

Sidebar On/Off

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.

continue...

V V

Notes

Message