TagBAC(45)

Wp I }liI fT C t :T :fl;b & ; •} = Hii? I : I+ q: g AUGUST 59 1983 B 8/5/83 AC 150/5020-1 Land or Interest in land (easement) nay be acquired by negotiatIon, through a voluntary program, or via coadeanatloa, in any case, the provisIons of the Uniform RelocatIon Assistance and Real Property &quisltion PoIIcies &:t of 1970 (P,L, 91'-646) are applicable whenever Federal or federally 'a$slsted prograas are involved , a, Land for Other PubIIc Uses, NoIse inpact:ed land can in acquired by a public or seal-pubIIc agency eIther to implealent the coapatlb111ty plan or in cooperatIon wIth the plan while full 111:Ing another pubIIc purpose , TypIcal uses nay Include sites for equIpaeat aaiateaance or storage yards, water or sewer works, and floodway$ or reservoIrs, Other possIbiIItIes Include selected park, recreation, and open space uses whIch are noise tolerant (golf courses, skeet ranges, nature areas, etc,), All uses should respect the heIght and hazard requirements of the aIrport and be tolerant of future aIrport growth, b, land for Compatible Resale, (k:c3siona11y, state or local governments are wilIIng to acquIre land whIch is then resold wIth covenants or easement:s retained to assure long-tern coapatlbility, in some cases, it nay be feasible to change such land to coapatible uses wIthin existing or 1::enodeled buIldings, in other cases, it wuld te desIrable to clear and redevelop the land before makIng it available for sale, in eIther case, the changes should be in compIIance with the land use plan…

b 1 attachment View Open in browser Download Sent from my iPhone WH•P R .A + a;t A{t -' -bJ+' aiR IFb£J£q„ ;Q '---- h®hl: StIg? AJPIIi$1bLF : :: r J L:::a bLIr }; Kb €q7 q '.($ WIJ GPth (;#F;} t 11F&I& ez wr gb& - -- gP- ;I/hd /A\ i +;It;paul ’ty’; C#b-ri Cttl/t *tt: , , . ', H n,n - - -f „ ' #"na'v+u-HO i++penH++a i /,Fgiikhi -AwWbH€Nr '(, ('X+ ,..,. A } Jill }: !- VCF### 8 : {: C/x, Sal N + p :ng H =lark VI 4th VI _ e)MOMA}( a &Bad;v& hi T:a t1 b ;•:,e ' li;i.i--i:;i':T : iLl•-r.b•• •;.ra e;;}. ' b';:'_ ;' of 9/25/19, 3:05 PM El Centro Input to Legislative Task Force of Burien Airport Cmteemes Moines Aviation Advisow Cmtee#ederal Way <mbjumpstart@msn.com> 9/2}/2019 8:41 AM To Debt Vagner, ShaH’n Parker - and 5 others Dear Debi, Earnest, Millie and Shawn, In prep for Legislative Task Force Meeting, below is El Centro's input. Looking forward to meeting on 10 a.m. 9-25-19 Starbucks 148th & Ambaum. Maria c: John Rising ,$*„„_[g}f,,2,G,}„g_p.t$g$},„$,Qb},f}.d $,eg+,GOB{ GQy,ORi.{„.{e.$R<=}„,vh!„an_2£}§.g 8} Strengthen reference to exi${ing responsit> iiity for air transport8 tion p:anlqjng in Vision 205€3, b} P SRC c$eve top budget for 202€) WA }egi$!8ture ask. See de tails in ernaii beiow. <Working with Seattle CM Mo$queda's office for Vision 205(> amendment.} 8. For 2019/2€32C> PoN of Seattie caarn!$$ioners a} Pas& poi icy {c includa in Port’s purPose triple bottom line of ecanornie, env}ronrnent81 and socia…

COMPARISON OF RESEARCHED AIRPORTS ON SPECIFIC ISSUES OF MEMBERSHIP, RECORDING, AND INVITED EXPERTS Explanation: BAe members and other cities’ airport committees identified some specific issues concerning StART deliberations. The Bylaws of each were reviewed and the cornparison below is extracted from those documents. // SPECIFIC ISSUES Membership by elected officials. mio-visual recordings made. Agenda-setting and motions. Advanced notices and materiats. Inclusion of expert witnesses or speakers at meetings. CHARLOTrE-DOUGLAS AIRPORT IN NC ers frorn :14 city council districts (7 elected); 9 from local county districts (6 elected); plus alternates. Printed summaries provided. Super-majority o membership) required to adopt new recommendations directed to FAA. Officers set agendas. Emailed or mailed in advance without specifying how many days in advance. Public is welcorne at all meetings and subcommittees and are invited to comment. Mute on the question of speakers or expert witnesses included. StART INCLUDES? ! BAC COMMENTARY Y/N CHICAGO O’HARELAX AIRPORT IN CA Electeds from city, county, state, or federal jurisdictions preferred, with alternates approved; +FAA, tAX & airlines; one at-large member. Recordings of meetings are avaitable to the public. Highest priority.No record- ings for public. No; POS determines with contracted facilitator. Yes, POS has agreed to this condition. No, POS will not agree . LAX has a facilitator; majority rules. No steering committee; prefer citizen co-chair. Notices at least 72 hours in advance; materials as soon as possible. High priority. Public is welcome at all meetings and subcommittees; invited to comment. Two methods of inclusion: 1) Recognized organizational representatives; 2)…

Chapter 13. Airport Noise and Access Restrictions 13.1. Introduction and Responsibilities. This chapter contains guidance on the sponsor’s responsibility with regard to restrictions on airport noise and access. Access restrictions have the potential to violate the federal obligation to make the airport available for public use on reasonable terms and without unjust discrimination as required by Grant Assurance 22, EconomIc Nondiscrimination. It is the responsibility of the airports district offices (ADOs) and regional airports divisions to advise sponsors on the laws and policies that apply to access restrictions and to ensure that the sponsor extends equitable treatment to all of the airport's aeronautical users. Airport Noise and Capacity Act of 1990 (ANCA) requires airport sponsors proposing restrictions on operations by Stage 2 or Stage 3 aircraft to conform to 14 CFR Part 161 Notice and Approval of Airport Noise and Access Restrictions. (Photo: FAA). 13.2. Background. a. The legal framework with respect to abatement of aviation noise may be summarized as follows: (1). The federal government has preempted the areas of airspace use and management, air traffic control, safety, and the regulation of aircraft noise at its source. The federal government also has substantial power to influence airport development through its administration of the Airport Improvement Program (AIP). (2). Other powers and authorities to control aircraft noise rest with the airport proprietor – including the power to select an airport site, acquire land, assure compatible land use, and control airport design, scheduling and operations – subject to constitutional prohibitions against…