EXH0664024775

PCHBPollution Control Hearings Board of the State of Washington

5B08 Lake Washington Blvd. N.E. Suite 200 KJrldand.WA 98033-7350 425,822-8880 • Fax: 425-889-S808 • www.parametrix.com DRAFT MEMORANDUM To: Keith Smith _ February 28, 2000 ' Background This memorandum provides a scope and budget for conducting range-finding Water-Effect Ratios (W'ERs) using just receiving water from Miller and Des Moines Creeks. Recall that such testing is necessary in the event that the Port is not granted a mixing zone. The budget only includes costs associated with conducting the tests, and does not include _ additional consulting time that may be required (e.g., meetings with the Port or with DOE or responding to Port comments). The objective of the range-finding WERs is to determine if the final WERs would be robust enough to warrant the expense of conducting definitive studies. The range-finding studies consist of concurrent acute toxicity tests with copper- spiked site water and copper-spiked laboratory water. A median lethal conceaatration (LC50) is then deteimined for each water, and the two LC50s are compared to generate a WER: LC50 Site Water =WER LC50 Laboratory Water The WER is then applied to the generic water quality standard to derive a site-specific standard: WER * Genetic WQS = Site-speei.6c WQS For example, if the water quality standard for a chemical is 3 _tg/L, and a WER of 3 is derived for a particular site, the resulting site-speclfic water quality standard would be 9 ,g/L. Unlike a definitive _ study, exposure concenlrations in a range-finding WER study are not analytically verified, and the resulting LC50s…
V V