Notes

Attorney Michael P. Witek of the Airport Communities Coalition declares under penalty of perjury that exhibits attached to this declaration are true and correct copies of previously filed documents. The declaration supports ACC’s Motion for Summary Judgment related to Section 401 Certification and CZMA concurrency statement issued August 10, 2001, concerning construction of a Third Runway at Sea-Tac Airport. The attached exhibits are pages from declarations of William A. Rozeboom, Dr. John Strand, and Dr. Peter Willing filed in support of ACC’s Motion for Stay.

Sidebar On/Off

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.

continue...

V V

Notes

Message