June 11, 2002August 2, 2026

Order correcting the earlier order publishing certain portions of depositions of Ecology managers and CR 30(b)(6) designated witnesses

Notes

The Pollution Control Hearings Board issued a correcting order supplementing its April 22, 2002 order regarding the publication of deposition excerpts from Department of Ecology managers and CR 30(b)(6) designated witnesses. The Board declined to reconsider portions excluded on relevancy or vagueness grounds, noting that materials related to political pressure are not relevant in its de novo review capacity. The Board did clarify seven specific instances where lines from the depositions of Eric Stockdale and Ray Hellwig should be published.

Sidebar On/Off

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.

continue...

V V

Notes

Message