Slide 42 from a Sea-Tac Airport environmental review presentation comparing impacts across three alternatives (No Action, Proposed Action, and Hybrid Terminal Option) for resource categories including Air Quality, Climate, Coastal Resources, and Department of Transportation Act Section 4(f). The slide indicates that criteria pollutant and GHG emissions would increase under Alternatives 2 and 3 compared to No Action but are not considered significant, and that Coastal Resources and Section 4(f) resources would not be adversely affected.Open full document
Notes
Slide 42 from a Sea-Tac Airport environmental review presentation comparing impacts across three alternatives (No Action, Proposed Action, and Hybrid Terminal Option) for resource categories including Air Quality, Climate, Coastal Resources, and Department of Transportation Act Section 4(f). The slide indicates that criteria pollutant and GHG emissions would increase under Alternatives 2 and 3 compared to No Action but are not considered significant, and that Coastal Resources and Section 4(f) resources would not be adversely affected.
