TagSea-Tac Communities Plan(236)

RCW 47.80.020: Regional transportation planning organizations audI.., https://app]eg.wa.gov/RCW/default ,aspx?cites+7.80.020 RCW 47.80.020 Regional transportation planning organizations authorized The legislature hereby authorizes creation of regional transportation planning organizations within the state. Each regional transportation planning organization shall be fonned through the voluntary association of local governments within a county, or within geographically contiguous counties. Each organization shall: (1) Encompass at least one complete county; (2)(a) Have a population of at least one hundred thousand, (b) have a population of at least seventy-five thousand and contain a Washington state ferries terminal, (c) have a population of at least forty thousand and cover a geographic area of at least five thousand square miles, or (d) contain a minimum of three counties; and (3) Have as members all counties within the region, and at least sixty percent of the cities and towns within the region represent}ng a minimum of seventy-five percent of the cibes' and towns' population. The state department of transportation must verify that each regional transportation planning organization conforms with the requirements of this section In urbanized areas, the regional transportation planning organization is the same as the metropolibnplanrling olr anizati_Qn®_s_ignated for federal transportation planning purposes [ 2017 c 68 § '1; 2016 c 27 § 1; 1990 1 st ex.s. c 17 § 54.] NOTES EWective date 2016 c 27: "This act takes effect July 1, 2016.’' [ 2€:)16 c 27 § 2.] of 9/17/19. 4:24 PM

RCW 36.70A.200: Siting of essential public facilities–Limitation on... https://app.leg.wa.gov/rcw/default .aspx?cite=36.70A.200 RCW 36.7QA.200 Siting of essential public facilities–Limitation on liability. \ (1) The comprehensive plan of each county and city that is planning under RCVV t:A 3$.7©A.©4© shall include a process for identifying and siting essen Bat pubftc facifiHes. Essential //// public facilities include those facilities that are typically difficult to site, such as airports, state pIt education facilities and state or regional transportation facilities as defined in RCW 47.€>6.340, regional transft authority facilities as de6ned in RCW $q. q': 2,{}2G, state and local correctional facilities, solid waste handling facilities, and inpatient facilities including substance abuse facilities, mental health facilities, group homes, and secure community transition facilities as defined in ROW 7§,©$.©2© (2) Each county and city planning under ROW 36.78A.840 shall, not later than September 1, 2002, establish a process, or amend its existing process, for identifying and siting essential public facilities and adopt or amend its development regulations as necessary to provide for the siting of secure community transition facilities consistent with statutory requirements applicable to these facilities. (3) Any city or county not planning under RCW 36,7€)A.04€) shall, not later than September 1, 2002, establish a process for siting secure community transition facilities and adopt or amend its development regulations as necessary to provide for the siting of such facilities consistent with statutory requirements applicable to these facilities. (4) The office of $nanciat management shall ma}ntain a tist of those essential state pubtic facilities that are required or…

RCW 70.94.037: Transportation activities– "Conformity" determina... https://app leg.wa.gov/RCW/default .aspx?cite=70.94.037 RCW 70.94.037 Transportation activities–"Conformity" determination requirements. In areas subject to a state implementation plan, no state agency, metropolitan planning organization, or local government shall approve or fund a transportation plan, program, or project within or that affects a nonattainment area unless a determination has been made that the plan, program, or project conforms with the state implementation plan for air quality as required by the federal clean air act Conformity determination shall be made by the state or local government or metropolitan planning organization administering or developing the plan, program, or project. No later than eighteen months after May 15, 1991, the director of the department of ecology and the secretary of transportation, in consultation with other state, regional, and local agencies as appropriate, shall adopt by rule criteria and guidance for demonstrating and assuring conformity of ptarts, programs, and projects that are who}}y' or parbatty federaHy funded. A project with a scope that is limited to preservation or maintenance, or both, shall be exempted from a conformity determination requirement. [ 1991 c 199 § 219.] NOTES: Finding–1991 c 199: See note following RCW 70.94.611. of 10/2/19, 10:34 AM

Sea--Tac Airport: Passenger and Air Cargo Activity Number of passengers at Sea---Tac continues to grow More than 46 million passengers passed through Seattle-Tacoma International Airport in 2017, representing a 2.6% increase compared to the previous year. August 2017 was the busi- est month yet, with over 4.8 million passengers. Consistent with previous years, the summer months of July and August continue to be the busiest, accounting for 20% of the total passerI- ger volumes in 2017. Sea-Tac Monthly Passenger Volumes, 2014-2017 ShA $$ h ii tX::;}: iii!! ! !! ;it:: hiI$: @g§ ##ii iiI ??gig!;;B: Si }] III:i?;i;I ian feb Mil! ;?I- faaif JEn L}Ui Au-q @ 2014 + 2015 e 2016 e 2017 Sep act Nav Dec Passenger volumes show signs of stabilizing Sea-Tac Passenger Volumes, 2014-2017 While the total passenger levels continue to grow, the growth rate shows signs of stabilizing. The airport saw record growth in 2015, when there was a 13% increase in passenger volumes compared to 2014. A similar year-over-year com- parison shows an 8% increase in total passenger volumes between 2015-2016 and 2.6% increase between 2016-2017. ;I:it;}L)i:}}}$ # 2(3:4 20iS 20i5 201 6 203 1) 2027 1011 Western Avenue, Suite 500 ' Seattle, WA 98104-1035 ' 206-464-7532 ' info@psrc.org ' https://www.psrc.org ' April 25, 2018 Rapid growth in air cargo activity Sea-Tac Air Cargo Volumes, 2014-2017 While growth in passenger travel shows signs of stabilizing, air cargo continues its rapid increase. Over 425,895 metric tons of cargo passed through the airport in 2017. Most…

Puget Sound Regional Council Board Room - - 5th Floor 1011 Western Avenue, Seattle, Washington 98104 Puget Sound Regional Council Port of Seattle Highline School District Washington State Department of Transportation King County International Airport g; ; f Progress Report Puget Sound Regional Council 4th ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT Puget Sound Regional Council Progress Report October 26, 2000 Implementing Resolution A-96-02 and ImP Appendix G Air Transportation Noise Reduction Measures and Implementing and Monitoring Steps Responsible Agency : Puget Sound Regional Council Appendix G Action Item: III. A. Seek funding to (a) actively participate in the Port’s upcoming Part 150 Study; (b) undertake a study to evaluate a financing mechanism for the acquisition of incompatible uses as noted in III-G, below; and (c) conduct surveys as noted in III-H, below. Steps Taken and Progress Made: The Air Transportation work scope and budget included these tasks. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) funding received was limited to PSRC participation in the Sea-Tac Airport Part 150 Study Update. Funding for the other two tasks (the Property Acquisition Financial Feasibility Study and scoping for the survey task) was obtained from other PSRC sources. Additional funding to conduct the actual survey was budgeted for fiscal year 1999, and will be carried over to the year 2001, the likely date for survey implementation (due to the construction delay). Regarding the Port of Seattle’s Sea-Tac Part 150 Study, interviews were held June 3, 1997; a consultant was selected; and the project is nearing completion, with Port Commission action scheduled…

’Milanese, Marco'; Joe Scorcio - City of SeaTac; MMatthias@desmoineswa.gov Fagerstrom, Thomas; Shepherd, Stan; Chip Davis; Lori Fleming; Council Members RE: Contacts within the Cities to connect with on resumption of Port's single-family sound insulation program Mr. Milanese (Marco): Our Community Development Director Chip Davis will be the contact point for the City of Burien. His information is as follows: Chip Davis, Director, Community Development chipd@burienwa .gov 206.248.5501 Brian J. Wilson City Manager City of Burien (206) 248-5503 office (206) 376-7102 cell BrianW@burien wa .gov Bu rienwa .gov NOTiCE OF PUBLIC DiSCLOSURE: This e-mail account is public domain. Any correspondence from or to this e-mail account may be a public record. Accordingly/ this e-mail, in whole or in part, may be subject to disclosure pursuant to RCW 42.56, regardless of any claim of confidentiality or privilege asserted by an external party. From: Milanese, Marco [mailto:Milanese.M@portseattle.org] Sent: Monday, June 11, 2018 5:29 PM To: Joe Scorcio - City of SeaTac <jscorcio@ci.seatac.wa.us>; Brian Wilson <BrianW@burienwa.gov>; M Matthias@desmoineswa .gov Cc: Fagerstrom, Thomas <Fagerstrom@portseattle.org>; Shepherd, Stan <Shepherd .S@ portseattle.org> Subject: Contacts within the Cities to connect with on resumption of Port's single-family sound insulation program Joe, Brian and Michael – The Port of Seattle’s single-family sound insulation program will resume this summer for eligible homeowners in Seatac, Burien and Des Moines. C&S Engineers has been retained by the Port for program management and they, as a first step, would like to have the opportunity to meet with city staff to begin to familiarize themselves with…

Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (Sea-Tac) Part 150 Study http://www.airportsites .net/SEA-Part 150/ Google Translated to: English HaN tP>::i’I HOME MErriNGS QUESIIONS Announcements FAA Issues Record of Approval Final Part 150 Study Document SEPA Threshold, Determination and Checklist SEPA Final Determination Detailed Noise Contours available / IN 41 + sn+ Contact Information Stan Shepherd Airport Noise Programs Manager Port of Seattle P.O. Box 68727 Seattle, WA 98168 Rob Adams Part 150 Project Manager Landrum & Brown 11279 Cornell Park Dr Cincinnati, OH 45242 English $11} Powered by GD g ie Translate Options VShow original GLOSSARYLINKS coFrrAcrDOCUMEMrs Record of Approval The Port of Seattle is pleased to announce that the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has approved Seattle-Tacoma International Airport's Part 150 Noise and Land Use Compatibility Study. A copy of the FAA's Record of Approval, which includes summaries of the study’s noise mitigation measures, is available Mr £_ Further information regarding condominium insulation is expected soon from the FAA. ; Port staff will now begin work on developing a Part 150 Study prioritization plan for the Port of Seattle Commission’s consideration. Sea-Tac Airport is known for having one of the most comprehensive noise reduction programs in the nation and the approval of the study will help the port to further minimize the impact of airport noise on its neighboring communities. ; Welcome to the Seattle-Tacoma International Airport Part 150 Study The Port of Seattle worked with Landrum & Brown to update its Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study for the Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (Sea-Tac), lad„completed…

This PDF is availahle at http://nap.edu/22519 ; i1:n: HFHrF&mInPIaAm n&& r O Guidelines for Airport Sound Insulation Programs (2013) KCRF R£POlrr B9 DETAILS 312 pages 1 8.5 x 11 1 PAPERBACK ISBN 978-o-309-28341-o I DOI 10.17226/22519 CONTRIBUTORS GET THIS BOOK Michael K. Payne, Rita A. Smith, Deborah Murphy Lagos, Jack Freytag, Mark Culverson, Jean Lesicka, James Leana, Robert R. Smith, A. Vernon WoodwoNh, and Robert Valerio; Airport Cooperative Research Program; Transportation Research Board; National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and MedicineFIND RELATED TITLES SUGGESTED CITATION National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine 2013. Guidelines for Airport Sound Insulation Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/22519. Visit the National Academies Press at NAP.edu and login or register to get: Access to free PDF downloads of thousands of scientific reports I09£ off the price of print titles Email or social media notifications of new tides related to your interests Special offers and discounts Distribution, p08ting, or copying of thi6 PDF ie 6trict ly prohibited without written permission of the National Academies Press. (Request Permission) Unless otherwise indicated, all materials in this PDF are copyrighted by the National Academy of Sciences. Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved . Guidelines for Airport Sound Insulation Programs FOREWORD By Theresia H. Schatz Staff Officer Transportation Research Board ACRP Report 89: Guidelines for Airport Sound Insulation Programs provides updated guidelines for sound insulation of residential and other noise-sensitive buildings for poten- tial use by airport and non-airport sponsors to develop and effectively manage their…

appreciated the City of Des Moines’ work to convene last week’s discussion with Normandy Park, Burien, SeaTac and airport staff to review Xhe airport’s Concourse D Hardstand Hold room project and the Determination of Non–Significance (DNS). I understand this was a direct and open conversation about concerns with the project. We recognize that growth-related projects at Sea-Tac must be evaluated together in the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP) to assure that cumulative environmental impacts are addressed. The addendum to the DNS issued on July 21, 2017, which Port staff prepared after last week’s meeting, provided more specifics related to the Marcistand Hotdroom project timing and scope, showing a net reduction of gates in operation until mid-2021. The SAMP environmental review, which is anticipated to be conducted in 2018, will account for all existing and approved gates and passenger loading facilities. This includes the North Sate}lite, the international Arrivats Facility, and the Concourse D Hardstand Holdroom. No additional gates are anticipated until the completion and approval of the Sustainable Airport Master Plan and associated environmental review, At the same time, we recognize the need for increased effective and informative communication with our adjacent cities. I have greatly appreciated the leadership you and your colleagues in the city of Des Moines have shown in working with the Airport on airport issues and regarding the forrnation of an Aviation Advisory Comrnittee at Sea-Tac Airport. i am currently in the process of seeking input from our city partners and have scheduled a meeting with…

Port of Seattle Aviation and Sustainability Department P.O. Box 68727 Seattie, WA 98168 RE: DNS for Concourse D Hardstand Holdroom Port of Seattle SEPA File Number 17-02 The City of Des Moines appreciates the opportunity to comment on the SEPA Determination of Nonsignificance {DNS) dated June 6, 20:17 for the Concourse D Hardstand Holdroom project. The project documents indicate that the Concourse D Hardstand Holdroom is intended to serve existing passenger levels, however, the environrnental checklist also notes that Sea-Tac airport has experienced rapid growth in both passengers and aircraft operations in the past few years which is maximizing use of terminal holdrooms and airplane gate capacity. The environmental checklist further indicates that current estimates and near-term forecasts of gate capacity and demand show increasing gate short falls. It appears that the facility is anticipated to serve current operations as well as future growth. It is unclear where this proposal fits in the context of the Sustainable Airport Master Plan in addressing future passenger growth, needed passenger handling facilities, and appropriate mitigation. The DNS should clarify how this proposed enhancement to airport facilities is related to future growth and the Sustainable Airport Master Planning process. The City of Des Moines experiences disproportionate impacts from aircraft operations because of our proximity to Sea-Tac International airport, and Des Moines residents are constantly challenged by noise and health impacts. As a result, the City continues to request that any enhancements to the airport facilities are thoroughly analyzed in a comprehensive manner for impacts…