TagBurien Airport Committee(37)

Wp I }liI fT C t :T :fl;b & ; •} = Hii? I : I+ q: g AUGUST 59 1983 B 8/5/83 AC 150/5020-1 Land or Interest in land (easement) nay be acquired by negotiatIon, through a voluntary program, or via coadeanatloa, in any case, the provisIons of the Uniform RelocatIon Assistance and Real Property &quisltion PoIIcies &:t of 1970 (P,L, 91'-646) are applicable whenever Federal or federally 'a$slsted prograas are involved , a, Land for Other PubIIc Uses, NoIse inpact:ed land can in acquired by a public or seal-pubIIc agency eIther to implealent the coapatlb111ty plan or in cooperatIon wIth the plan while full 111:Ing another pubIIc purpose , TypIcal uses nay Include sites for equIpaeat aaiateaance or storage yards, water or sewer works, and floodway$ or reservoIrs, Other possIbiIItIes Include selected park, recreation, and open space uses whIch are noise tolerant (golf courses, skeet ranges, nature areas, etc,), All uses should respect the heIght and hazard requirements of the aIrport and be tolerant of future aIrport growth, b, land for Compatible Resale, (k:c3siona11y, state or local governments are wilIIng to acquIre land whIch is then resold wIth covenants or easement:s retained to assure long-tern coapatlbility, in some cases, it nay be feasible to change such land to coapatible uses wIthin existing or 1::enodeled buIldings, in other cases, it wuld te desIrable to clear and redevelop the land before makIng it available for sale, in eIther case, the changes should be in compIIance with the land use plan…

b 1 attachment View Open in browser Download Sent from my iPhone WH•P R .A + a;t A{t -' -bJ+' aiR IFb£J£q„ ;Q '---- h®hl: StIg? AJPIIi$1bLF : :: r J L:::a bLIr }; Kb €q7 q '.($ WIJ GPth (;#F;} t 11F&I& ez wr gb& - -- gP- ;I/hd /A\ i +;It;paul ’ty’; C#b-ri Cttl/t *tt: , , . ', H n,n - - -f „ ' #"na'v+u-HO i++penH++a i /,Fgiikhi -AwWbH€Nr '(, ('X+ ,..,. A } Jill }: !- VCF### 8 : {: C/x, Sal N + p :ng H =lark VI 4th VI _ e)MOMA}( a &Bad;v& hi T:a t1 b ;•:,e ' li;i.i--i:;i':T : iLl•-r.b•• •;.ra e;;}. ' b';:'_ ;' of 9/25/19, 3:05 PM El Centro Input to Legislative Task Force of Burien Airport Cmteemes Moines Aviation Advisow Cmtee#ederal Way <mbjumpstart@msn.com> 9/2}/2019 8:41 AM To Debt Vagner, ShaH’n Parker - and 5 others Dear Debi, Earnest, Millie and Shawn, In prep for Legislative Task Force Meeting, below is El Centro's input. Looking forward to meeting on 10 a.m. 9-25-19 Starbucks 148th & Ambaum. Maria c: John Rising ,$*„„_[g}f,,2,G,}„g_p.t$g$},„$,Qb},f}.d $,eg+,GOB{ GQy,ORi.{„.{e.$R<=}„,vh!„an_2£}§.g 8} Strengthen reference to exi${ing responsit> iiity for air transport8 tion p:anlqjng in Vision 205€3, b} P SRC c$eve top budget for 202€) WA }egi$!8ture ask. See de tails in ernaii beiow. <Working with Seattle CM Mo$queda's office for Vision 205(> amendment.} 8. For 2019/2€32C> PoN of Seattie caarn!$$ioners a} Pas& poi icy {c includa in Port’s purPose triple bottom line of ecanornie, env}ronrnent81 and socia…

COMPARISON OF RESEARCHED AIRPORTS ON SPECIFIC ISSUES OF MEMBERSHIP, RECORDING, AND INVITED EXPERTS Explanation: BAe members and other cities’ airport committees identified some specific issues concerning StART deliberations. The Bylaws of each were reviewed and the cornparison below is extracted from those documents. // SPECIFIC ISSUES Membership by elected officials. mio-visual recordings made. Agenda-setting and motions. Advanced notices and materiats. Inclusion of expert witnesses or speakers at meetings. CHARLOTrE-DOUGLAS AIRPORT IN NC ers frorn :14 city council districts (7 elected); 9 from local county districts (6 elected); plus alternates. Printed summaries provided. Super-majority o membership) required to adopt new recommendations directed to FAA. Officers set agendas. Emailed or mailed in advance without specifying how many days in advance. Public is welcorne at all meetings and subcommittees and are invited to comment. Mute on the question of speakers or expert witnesses included. StART INCLUDES? ! BAC COMMENTARY Y/N CHICAGO O’HARELAX AIRPORT IN CA Electeds from city, county, state, or federal jurisdictions preferred, with alternates approved; +FAA, tAX & airlines; one at-large member. Recordings of meetings are avaitable to the public. Highest priority.No record- ings for public. No; POS determines with contracted facilitator. Yes, POS has agreed to this condition. No, POS will not agree . LAX has a facilitator; majority rules. No steering committee; prefer citizen co-chair. Notices at least 72 hours in advance; materials as soon as possible. High priority. Public is welcome at all meetings and subcommittees; invited to comment. Two methods of inclusion: 1) Recognized organizational representatives; 2)…

Chapter 13. Airport Noise and Access Restrictions 13.1. Introduction and Responsibilities. This chapter contains guidance on the sponsor’s responsibility with regard to restrictions on airport noise and access. Access restrictions have the potential to violate the federal obligation to make the airport available for public use on reasonable terms and without unjust discrimination as required by Grant Assurance 22, EconomIc Nondiscrimination. It is the responsibility of the airports district offices (ADOs) and regional airports divisions to advise sponsors on the laws and policies that apply to access restrictions and to ensure that the sponsor extends equitable treatment to all of the airport's aeronautical users. Airport Noise and Capacity Act of 1990 (ANCA) requires airport sponsors proposing restrictions on operations by Stage 2 or Stage 3 aircraft to conform to 14 CFR Part 161 Notice and Approval of Airport Noise and Access Restrictions. (Photo: FAA). 13.2. Background. a. The legal framework with respect to abatement of aviation noise may be summarized as follows: (1). The federal government has preempted the areas of airspace use and management, air traffic control, safety, and the regulation of aircraft noise at its source. The federal government also has substantial power to influence airport development through its administration of the Airport Improvement Program (AIP). (2). Other powers and authorities to control aircraft noise rest with the airport proprietor – including the power to select an airport site, acquire land, assure compatible land use, and control airport design, scheduling and operations – subject to constitutional prohibitions against…

am writing to express my support for conducting a comprehensive cumulative impact assessment as part of the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the Port of Seattle’s Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP) for Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (SEA). SeaTac Airport is our region’s largest hub for passenger travel and air freight, moving nearly 52 million passengers and more than 450,000 metric tons of air cargo in 2019. This immense reach presents significant impacts and costs to the local cities and surrounding areas that fall within the Federal Aviation Administration’s (FAA) flight path. Some of the most notable obvious impacts include noise and air pollution. Our region is experiencing enormous growth and I believe that in order to fully assess the short-term and long-term impacts of future growth at SeaTac Airport, the FAA’s NEPA process must include an EIS that contains a comprehensive cumulative impact assessment. The current EIS scope only examines the thirty projects in the airport’s “near term” plans and relegates the long-term projects to be constructed after 2027 to a future EIS. Although it is true that many of the long-term projects in the SAMP cannot begin comprehensive planning without the near-term projects being completed, a separate environmental analysis is disjointed and could harm the integrity of the published study. This full EIS should also include necessary mitigation strategies associated with those short and long-term projects identified in the Port of Seattle’s SAMP. encourage the FAA to conduct the full EIS now, thus examining short and long-term community impacts in…

Likemany cities, the City of Burien and the Burien community are facing unprecedented challenges as the coronavirus pandemic continues. If another federal coronavirus relief package is needed in 2021, and the following issues have not been adequately addressed in a previous package, these concerns should be included in a 2021 federal coronavirus package: Help with rental payments Homeless shelter funding Small business assistance Childcare support Unemployment funding School meals and school nutrition services Food security, including culturally appropriate food (added 10.5) Workforce development retraining for employees who have lost jobs during the pandemic Help for local community banks that work with underserved communities Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) for medical facilities and workplaces (added 10.5) City funding to avoid unnecessary layoffs and service cutbacks. Ensure that funding secured for transportation and infrastructure projects comply with Minority Business Enterprises (MBEs), Disadvantage Business Enterprises (DBEs),and women—owned businesses, rules and regulations. (added 10.5) Reduce A_ir_portNoise and Emissions Work with our Congressional delegation, neighboring communities, the FAA,and the Port of Seattle to reduce SeaTac Airport noise and emissions by: Promoting and supporting a regional "Coalition of E|ecteds”, or other regional forum, to bring airport noise and emission issues before Congress, the FAA,and the Port; s Work with the FAA regional ombudsperson to address issues raised by Burien and other airport cities; Encourage the Port to complete another Part 150 aircraft noise study; Support HR 2351, known as the Aviation Impacted Communities Act that creates Aviation Impacted Community Boards to help citizens to better and more…