The Airport Communities Podcast
In our last episode, The 400,000lb tube going 200mph, we talked about what everyone always wants to talk about: flight paths. Because deep down, people just want the airplanes to go somewhere else. So much so, the subject always goes to extremes: Magical thinking, We’re doomed, Don’t like it? Move!’
We outlined the differences between ‘tower’ and ‘TRACON’ and FAA lingo like SIDs, STARs, RNAV, glide slopes. But beneath the hundreds of thousands of lines of code that define all the flight procedures for professionals, what you care about at Sea-Tac is The Four Post Plan–eight pages. That is all you need to know about why the airplanes follow these paths. The entire premise is simple: The Greater Good Argument. Improving efficiency also reduces the number of people impacted by aviation impacts. Win. win.
This second half looks at what it means to try to change one flight path using the two techniques: the courts or consultants.
We examine the Burien 250 – a procedure known as a CATEX, or ‘automation’ — one of the hundreds of routine exceptions to the main procedures that never get discussed unless someone complains. These are handled by the lawyers you can hire, typically people who move back and forth between industry and communities.
Then there are the consultants. The people you did not know you needed to hire.
Both approaches are expensive, both are ad hoc, and neither has a good track record because as any professional will tell you: seen one airport, seen one airport. It really does take years to learn the territory.
The stats that people follow, the ones concerning flight paths and noise, are designed to fail. The thresholds needed to compel the FAA to change any flight path are so high they can never be exceeded at airports like Sea-Tac. CATEX, schmatex. That is The Casino. A compelling game designed to keep you playing and never win.
We do not talk about flight paths because we need a different kind of Greater Good Argument. We need to start developing a language of mitigation, something we don’t know how to do because the only thing people think about today is “making the airplanes go somewhere else.” The process has shut down our ability to think of other options.
As a test, perhaps we need to start asking everyone to pay a little. Not only passengers, but people within the TRACON who want their area given special treatment. Everyone must start ponying up in order to create the proper incentives. Otherwise, there will never be equity for people who cannot move.
After finishing this episode, we left something on the cutting room floor which we also left out of an earlier episode A-Weighted. We wanted to make it clear enough just how high various thresholds for being in violation of FAA standards really are for both noise and criteria pollutants. We said that this threshold is higher than the theoretical limit of the airport, a bold statement which happens to be true. We thought it would add too much to already long episodes. We will address that in a future episode.
Topics
- Ep #24 The 400,000lb tube going 200mph
- Ep #4: The Railroad In The Sky!
- Ep #14 A-Weighted
- Ep #17 The Airport Discount
- SAMP EA Chapter #3 – Affected Environment
- Four Post Plan from FAA DECISION and ORDER
- Gate to Gate How the FAA Manages Air Traffic
- FAA Puget Sound Area Airspace Explainer
- Burien stirred up by roar from sharp increase in Sea-Tac Airport overflight
- City of Burien v. FAA 18-71705
- Des Moines City Council Study Session June 6, 2019: SAMP Consultants
- DCA Fly Quiet SOA white paper
- FAA JO7400.2R Handling Airspace Matters
To learn how you can make a difference:
- STNI.info/subscribe
- Find us on all the best podcasts, including Apple and Spotify, or subscribe via SSAppleSpotifyYoutube