TRN0009056666

PCHBPollution Control Hearings Board of the State of Washington

hearsay objection to this. This is even more egregious. This is a port-generated document. And this is not the witness to bring this in for the truth of the matter asserted. MR. PEARCE: I can lay a foundation. But it's the same type of document as 1118. MS. COTTINGHAM: This is a draft memorandum, so do you want to make your arguments? Q. (Continuing By Mr. Pearce) : Are you familiar with this document, Dr. Stubblefield? A. Yes, I have seen this document, that's correct. Q. Is this the same type of document as in 1118? MR. STOCK: Object, vague. Q. Is this a range-finding WERS study? A. This document presents the results of some range-finding toxicity tests that were conducted, that's correct. Q. Is this the data draft or -- A. No, the data are actually laboratory bench data sheets, which is the kind of things that, frankly, I would want to see, as opposed to a summary report. It is the true basis of what was generated as opposed to a report that may or may not adequately reflect all of the data that were gathered during the studies. MR. STOCK: Based upon that testimony, Your Honor, it's just getting more attenuated. It's actually AR 056666 WILLIAM STUBBLEFIELD, Ph.D./By Mr. Pearce 9-0060 now double hearsay, where attached to this port memorandum is lab results. No one is hear from the lab to cross examine. Dr. Stubblefield can't be cross examined on the lab results. He can't be cross…
V V