PCHB023000933

PCHBPollution Control Hearings Board of the State of Washington

Unpublished Disposition u u JUN - 6 2002(Cite as: 165 F.3d 35, 1998 WL 833628 (9th Cir.)) < SeyCite Yellow Flag > ENVIRONMENTAI NOTICE: THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED of this circuit except as provided by I_I__lGS OFFIC_ OPINION. Rule 36.3. (The Court's decision is referenced in a "Table **1 Petitioners ("the Cities") appeal the of Decisions Without Reported Opinions" Federal Aviation Administration's decision appearing in the Federal Reporter. Use FI granting final approval of the Master Plan CTA9 Rule 36-3 for rules regarding the development project adopted by the Port of citation of unpublished opinions.) Seattle for the expansion of the Seattle- Tacoma International Airport CSea-Tac"). We United States Court of Appeals, affirm. Ninth Circuit. The Cities argue that the Administrator's decision improperly relied on a "no growth" CITY OF NORMANDY PARK; City of Des demand model and a limited prediction Moines; City of Burien; City of Federal forecast thereby failing to accurately assess Way; the project's environmental impacts and City of Tukwila; Highline School District, necessary mitigation measures. Under the No. 401, individually and Airport and Airway Improvement Act collectively as the Airport Communities CAAIA"), 49 U.S.C. § 47106(c)(1)(C), an Coalition; Petitioners, Administrator may approve an airport v. development project that is found to have PORT OF SEATTLE, a Washington significant environmental effects "only after municipal corporation, Intervenor- finding that ... every reasonable step has been Respondent, taken to minimize the adverse effects." Here, v. the Administrator's lengthy decision indicates FEDERAL AVIATION a careful review of the project's potential…
V V