EXH1154043961

PCHBPollution Control Hearings Board of the State of Washington

- A Comparison of Pacific Groundwater and Hart Crowser Fill Modeling Approaches ..... B Estimates of Miller Creek Streamflow Effects as Predicted with Slice Model C Estimates of Historic Water Withdrawal in Miller Creek Buyout Area D HSPF Model Input and Results for Low Streamflow Conditions PortofSeattle i Seattle-Tacoma Airport Master Plan Update _. Low StreamflowAna_$U _.j '_4281601 _'rREAMFLOW ANAL YSIS.D0C AR 043963 LIST of TABLES Page Table 1: Recorded Average Flows August and September ............................................................ 1 Table 2: HSPF Model Streamflow in August and September for 1994 Land Use Conditions ...... 2 Table 3: Seven-Day Low Flows (cfs) Per HSPF Model of 1994 Land Use Conditions ................. 3 Table 4: HSPF Model Streamflow in August and September For 2006 Land Use Conditions ...... 3 Table 5: Seven-Day Low Flows (cfs) Per HSPF Model of 2006 Land Use Conditions ................. 3 Table 6: Estimates of Miller Creek Streamflow Effects from Fill Infiltration Discharge _............. 8 Table 7: Estimates of Walker Creek Streamflow Effects from Fill Infiltration Discharge I ........... 9 Table 8: Non-Hydrologic Changes In Summer Streamflow (PGG Report) ................................... 9 Table 9: Miller Creek Reserved Stormwater Release Rate Determination ................................... 19 Table 10: Des Moines Creek Reserved Stormwater Release Rate Determination t ...................... 19 Table I I : Summary of Miller Creek Streamflow Effects _............................................................ 26 Table 12: Summary of Walker Creek Streamflow Effects _.......................................................... 27 Table 13: Summary of Des Moines Creek Streamflow Effects x................................................... 28 LIST of FIGURES Page Figure 1: Annual Flow Duration Curves for A…
V V