EXH1018035023

PCHBPollution Control Hearings Board of the State of Washington

z when It stau:s, "Nothing in rids section _ be ¢cmw_,_ I:oaluw flz: laud-u_ powcx_ of cities." A distizz:dcn is thereby clearly drawn between p)-m'i. S in the tint immnce and, ultimately,e___c,__n_ onthoseplans. In ccmnst totheirlackof dominionoverrlz¢broadm" ![ planningprocess_ in _ or in rcsiom, _ main subsum_ poweroverw]_6 is in f_c uldmmly _ withintheirborders,t_vmin _:_ _ houever,_,'-'K s maybe direly Iimi_ by mm_ suchas RCW36.?0A.200,whichdirecmt_ no e _ planordevelopment=_ _ allowedm precludetl_ sitingof I_.CW36.70._210 omltn_ t _ for resohn_on of dJspmm _ _om. This _ not only _disu'oo, bute_o Zubermcorialpowerm _o. se sanctionsou _ _ f_ Toqrc¢. RCW36.70A.210(2Xd).I_docsnot includea nnmlcipa/ - is umnpmrd. is Tiros,k b clearthatno one"._risdiction_, absolmepower. No jurisdtcdon's t',_ml2r_,;ve plan autom-r_el"y controls the plan Of"another. R_W 36.70A.215 retr_orces_ point. It mmblislx=a rcq_ for_ and_iou of 91-,,*,but 1B no ¢omrolbyanysinSl¢j_ion. _ . P_ have¢h¢burdenin _ ac_onof demomU-al_.gu'_'Rmolu_n A-g6-_'s adoptionw= =bimry m_ mpriciomor_ _ m law. In _ F'md_,sandCouclmiomfiledthisday, theCourt_,, ruledt._tes ze l_solucion'sadoptionis not arbiu-aryor capricious.TheCourtnow also _ that plaintiffs' m_mmemthat RCW 47.80.023(2) by itself invalidates the PSRC's _n or zs otherwise renders it contraryto law is plainly _. Tlum_ is simply no pcmmtve AR 035029 z _:_. I_,_ haw _ a f_ _ wordsfromom ponio,,ofa _._-.c_, and th_ r_l _ in ir_b_n fr_n oc1_rwordsnot"_ly _ _ _ _ _ _n, b_in_ very_ su_a. I_._.,_. ha_ notmet t1_ir_ of _ __ and_ _ or of proving l]]q_ scdon ,,,_," RC'W47.80.02.q_2). Pot the _ s_ forth above _xt ixlthe F_inP of l_a_ aud_ of Law tumid _ _hisdaY,t1_ Cou_ diunL_…
V V