EXH0736026623

PCHBPollution Control Hearings Board of the State of Washington

Thereare someXXXs in onesectionwhereIwantedto referto thejustificationwe didforAmendment2 butI couldn_ immediatelylocateit. Hopefullyit isinthefile--ifnotletme knowand rll digdeeperin myfiles. Thanksforyourhelpandpleaseceilme at425-640-4310 if youhaveany questions. Ann SW-_a-JusCdoc(sz KS) DOE 1/4/02 055 AR 026623 J t DATE: December 13, 2001 TO: John Toohey, Office of Financial Management FROM: Jeannie Sutranerhays,Section Manager Shorelands and Environmental Assistance Program Northwest Regional Office THROUGH: Laura Lowe, Agency Contract Specialist Financial Services SUBJECT: Justification for Amendment No. 3 to Contract C0100121 Shannon and Wilson, Inc. The Depa_h,,ent of Ecology entered into a competitively awarded contract with Shannon and Wilson, Inc. on January 19, 2001 for work related to Ecology's review of the Port of Seattle's Natural Resource Mitigation Plan submitted as part of its Section 401 application for the proposed Third Runway project. An amendment to this agreement is needed to cover additional services generated by the considerable ..... workload in reviewing the Port's Natural Resource Mitigation Plan, to allow.Ecology to use Shatmon and Wilson as an expert wimess, and to allow Ecology to use Shannon and Wilson to provide field monitoring services. Ecology issued a 401 Water Quality Certification on August 10, 2001 and reissued it on September 21, 2001. The certification was appealed by the AirportConmumities Coalition. Ecology needs continuing technical support from Shannon and Wilson to review new and revised documents that were required by the Water Quality Certification. We also need supportfrom Shannon and Wilson as expert witnesses who can testify to the adequacy of the NR_MP.Finally, we will need support from Shannon and Wilson for…
V V