EXH0677025055

PCHBPollution Control Hearings Board of the State of Washington

Sent: Tuesday. July 10, 2001 3:22 PM To: Kenny. Ann; Drabek, John Subject: FW: Acceptable Fill Criteria Language for Draft 401 Certification ..... OnginalMessage..... From: Yee,Chung K. ,Sent: Wednesday,June 27, 2001 4:32 PM To: Kmet,Peter;Fitzpatrick,Kevm Cc: Thompson,CraigE. Subject: RE:AcceptableFillCriteriaLanguageforDraft401Certification Actually I have completed the draft just a few minutes ago. Please take a look at it first. Since I have actually reviewed many of the borrow sit ESA reports, I think the entire Table 749-3 listing may not be applicable. Many of these sites are virgin borrow pits. Knowing that, if you all think it is appropriate to incorporate the entire list, than it will be done. As to the upper six feet, I have incorporated the ecological standards. By the way, what is "clean natural soil". Repeating above, many of these sites are virgin sites. Craig, I put a hard copy of the latest (6/27) in your in-box. CleanFill Criteria for 401 Ce.,. .....OriginalMessage..... From: Kmet,_eter £=.er_z: Wedn,...-,day,June27, 200:4:01 PH Ta: FIG;.._.':F_ck,Kevin Cc: Yee,Chung* Subject: RE:AcceptabieFill C_iteriaLanguagefor D'-aff<,91Ce_ _ :_on DELIBERATIVE DOCUMENT CURRENTLY ;IXEMPT FRCM P"BLIC DISCLOSUF_E If we are not going to restrict fill ma',erial tc naturally occurring uncontaminated soils, I recom=nend you use the following language to address potential impacts on plants and animals The intent of this language is to ensure the fili material used wovid be "clean enougl-" that it would not be expecteJ to cause adverse impacts on plants and ar,:mals that come in contact with it. Note that th_sdoes not address potential human…
V V