EXH0574023764

PCHBPollution Control Hearings Board of the State of Washington

I. _: To define remaining water right issues relative to flow augmentation in Des Moines Creek, and to develop an action plan and schedule for resolving those issues. II. Attendees: Port of Seattle Department of Ecology Attorney General's Office Seattle Public Utilities Iii. potential Sources of Stream Flow Augmentation Water A. SPU Highline Well Field _r,,--__. B. Highline Water District Well. No. 1 ---'_%_ C,-_[k-_ to--") " C. Detained StormwaterWater_c__._-_o_-o_,v,d_. _--e_E-_ _,i_,_s_ _" ,-..r,,,_,. 7(_ Reclaimed _,,_e,_-i ..... _ .... _u.L --- _/v-c,ct__,,{,k_. Iv. SPU Highline Well Field A. Is a water right change of any kind necessary to use municipal water for flow augmentation? rj._r,-_4- - B. if so, what kind? _ _*_" 1) change in purpose of use? v_L_,-,-,--%_ 2) change in place of use? C. When is Ecology approval of changes needed? 1) Can the 401 certification be issued before necessa_ry - changes are approved? , / ._. _- - k<- ,c._ - DOE9/17/01 oos4 AR 023764 2) Can the change applicationbe processed before other_ _ • competing applicationsare filed, i.e., can the applicationbe r. expedited under WAC 173-152-050(3)? l-_q_._ __. (/vtt_ _'-- D. What information is required to process the chang,e. _ I._-_j,_, n_) application(s)? - [i) f £--_- ,_(_[Jl 1) information showing historic and current water usEge; __" 2) information showingno abandonment due to nonuse; _ dO) 3) information showing that the proposed change will not, _. ('. ,_ cause impairment of existing rights; ('_ 4"_ _ 4) information showing that the proposed change is…
V V