EXH0184018454

PCHBPollution Control Hearings Board of the State of Washington

Here's my draft denial letter, and the latest draft of the withdrawal letter below... Tom L. Original Message---- • . From: Fitzpatrick, Kevtn Sent: Wednesday. September 27. 2000 11:35 AM To: Luster. Tom; He,wig. Raymond; Marchioro. Joan (AT(;); Stockdale. Edk Subject: FW: Dinsmom Draft have mademy edits,deletionsandadditionstotheattacheddocumentinred. Kevin OriginalMessage From: Luster,Tom Sent: Wednesday,September27, 2000 10:01AM To: Hellwig,Raymond;Marchioro,Joan(ATG);Fitzpatrick,Kevin;Stockdale,Edk Subject: RE: DinsmoreDraft .,.." " Hi all - ATTORNEYCLIENTPRIVILEGED Thanks for the letter, Ray. I've made my edits in the attachment below. have a couple of main concerns: The draft unnecessarily and inappropriately limits the scope of our review. We've received a number of comments in the past couple of weeks that I have not yet been able to review, and I assume that some of those comments will need to be incorporated into our subsequent 401 ..... review. Additionally, we will be going through another public comment period, and we are likely to have several additional substantive issues raised that must be addressed, if we are to DOE]1/28/oo 3 1 6AR 018454 a provide a defensible 401 decision. We Cannotpromise the Port that this letter contains all the issues that need to be addressed, since -- ,ah we don't know them all yet, and since that would completely ignore the required public.process. -y It's not likely that every issue raised duringthe public comment period will need to be a part of our 401 review, but there will be some, andwe should not mislead the Port on this. We must be clear on…
V V