EXH0121017920

PCHBPollution Control Hearings Board of the State of Washington

Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2000 3:32 PM To: Luster, Tom; He,wig, Raymond; Fitzpatrick, Kevin; Marchioro, Joan (ATG); Stockdale, Erik ATTORNEY CLIENT PRIVILEGED DELIBERATIVE DOCUMENT Ray and company He._ are my suggestions for this letter as attached. tend to agree with Tom's comments and my additionsattempt to tighten up our language so we are not committingto a permit, but a rigorousreview of future submittals on a project we think has the "potential" to meet the standards for 401 certification. I alsoagree that the 60 days starts after the public comment period and the listof issues will have to reflect comments we get in the process. © POSwithdrawldraR. doc GordonWhite ProgramManager •ShorelandsandEnvironmentalAssistanceProgram WashingtonDepartmentof Ecology Ph:(360) 407-6977 EmaU:gwhH61_ecv,wa,9ov _ist_nt: Amy _u._ ..... Ph: (360) 407-6966 Fx: (360) 407-6902 AR 017920 DOE8/28/01 ooo2B DRAFT [Tom L's comments in s_-rikeo_, underline, and bracketed italics.] (Kevin's edits, deletions and additions appear in red) {Gordons edits are in this shade of red) 9/26/00 ! Mr. M.R. (Mic) Dinsmore, Executive Director Port of Seattle Address Dear Mr. Dinsmore: This letter is submitted pursuant to our ongoing discussions regarding the status of the Department of Ecology (Ecology's) review of the Port of Seattle (Port) application for a 40I Water Quality Certification for the Third Runway project. It is intended to describe in general terms the immediate situation from Ecology's perspective, and to offer a new project review process with intentions to render a decision on the Port's project within a reasonable period of time. The Port's runway project proposals…
V V