EXH0031017488

PCHBPollution Control Hearings Board of the State of Washington

,Sent: Monday, September 11, 2000 11:51 AM To: Fitzpatrick, Kevin Subject: RE: Clean Fill Criteria Language for the 401 Water Quality Certification on the Sea Tac Third Runway Here are my Comments. Make sure you open the attachment. / _(F'-_ ' "t- Clean Fill Criteria for 401 Ce... _Onginal Message_ From: Fitzpatrick, Kevin Sent: Friday, September 08, 2000 12:52 PM To: Kmet, Peter Subject: Clean Fill Criteria Language for the 401 Water Quality Certification on the Sea Tac Third Runway DELIBERATIVE DOCUMENT CURRENTLY EXEMPT FROM PUBLIC DISCLOSURE Pete: The following are additionsthat have been made to the 401 Certification language which are not reflected in the attached Word document below. E6. It sounds like we are allowingthe Port to use problem fill as long as the Port notify Ecology. I think the second sentence shouldexclude the use of inappropriate fill that may result inany potential impacts to waters of the state. E7c.2.(b) Should include appropriate EPA databases and the first list should read as "_Confirmed& Suspected Contaminated Sites Report" E7c.2.(e) "The fill material shall be analyzed for the potentialcontaminant(s) identifiedin the environmental site assessment. At a minimum, fill material from all sites shall be analyzed for TPH and Priority Pollutants metals for compliance with MTCA method A soilcleanup!evels in WAC 173-340-740." In the absence of MTCA method A soil cleanup levels, the potential contaminantsshall complywith MTCA method B _00 X Grc"nd':-atcr" soil cleanup levels." [There is more to Method B than the 100 X standard. Also, we are in the…
V V