EXH0014017275

PCHBPollution Control Hearings Board of the State of Washington

Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2000 5:16 PM To: Fitzpatrick, Kevin Subject: RE: Draft Language for Clean Fill Criteria in401 Certification DELIBERATWEDOCUMENTCURRENTLYEXEMPTFROMPUBLICDISCLOSURE Below are my comments on the draft. E6. It sounds like we are allowingthe Port to use problem fill as long as the Port notifyEcology. I think the second sentence shouldexclude the use of inappropriate fill that may result in any potential impacts to waters of the state. ETc.2.(b) Should includeappropriate EPA databases and the first list should read as "Confirmed & j Suspected Contaminated SitesReport" & E7c.2.(e) "The fillmaterial shall be analyzed for the potentialcontaminant(s) identified in the environmental site assessment. At a minimum, fill material from all sites shall be analyzed for TPH and PriorityPollutantsmetals for compliance with MTCA method A soil cleanup levels." In the absence of MTCA method A soil cleanup levels, the potentialcontaminants shall comply with MTCA method B "100 X Groundwater"soilcleanup levels."The sampling frequency.. ee if you want to add E7c.2.(f) after the sampling requirementtable. This is a repeat of a sort since the term "environmentalprofessional"is already used in couple of places. (f) All work shall be performed by an environmental professional,with appropriate training, experience and expertise in environmental site assessment. E7c.3. I don't thinkthey know where the placement locationyet. The location should be included in the as-builts to be submittedquarterly. ---Original Message-- From: Filzpatric_,Kevin Sent: Thurs0ay.August24,20003:22PM To: Luster.Tom;Yee,ChungK. Subject: DraftLanguageforCleanRHCriteriain401Certification DELIBERATWE DOCUMENT CURRENTLY EXEMPT FROM PUBLIC DISCLOSURE Tom & Chung Yee: Please find attached some proposed draft language for the clean fill…
V V