BAC SP Comparison Of Community Roundtables Charlotte LAX Chicago O’hare 0001

COMPARISON OF RESEARCHED AIRPORTS ON SPECIFIC ISSUES OF MEMBERSHIP, RECORDING, AND INVITED EXPERTS Explanation: BAe members and other cities’ airport committees identified some specific issues concerning StART deliberations. The Bylaws of each were reviewed and the cornparison below is extracted from those documents. // SPECIFIC ISSUES Membership by elected officials. mio-visual recordings made. Agenda-setting and motions. Advanced notices and materiats. Inclusion of expert witnesses or speakers at meetings. CHARLOTrE-DOUGLAS AIRPORT IN NC ers frorn :14 city council districts (7 elected); 9 from local county districts (6 elected); plus alternates. Printed summaries provided. Super-majority o membership) required to adopt new recommendations directed to FAA. Officers set agendas. Emailed or mailed in advance without specifying how many days in advance. Public is welcorne at all meetings and subcommittees and are invited to comment. Mute on the question of speakers or expert witnesses included. StART INCLUDES? ! BAC COMMENTARY Y/N CHICAGO O’HARELAX AIRPORT IN CA Electeds from city, county, state, or federal jurisdictions preferred, with alternates approved; +FAA, tAX & airlines; one at-large member. Recordings of meetings are avaitable to the public. Highest priority.No record- ings for public. No; POS determines with contracted facilitator. Yes, POS has agreed to this condition. No, POS will not agree . LAX has a facilitator; majority rules. No steering committee; prefer citizen co-chair. Notices at least 72 hours in advance; materials as soon as possible. High priority. Public is welcome at all meetings and subcommittees; invited to comment. Two methods of inclusion: 1) Recognized organizational representatives; 2)…
V V