BAC SP #2 0003

Really enjoyed coming over yesterday, your house is just lovely! ;• Here are the notes I jotted down: Title: Request for Assessment of Part 150 Compliance A position or fruit of thoughts, not an argument, but points as to why we feel the part 150 is out of compliance. *reference record of approval of existing part 150 *reference chapter 1 of current airport system before congress, as in your letter to the port, point 21 measure P-2 *Port staff has now declare they will do "parts" of the 150 within the SAMP, but those "parts" were not transparent in the public scoping process. They recently announced they would be doing this within the SEPA/ EIS process. *3rd runway never studied for the full time usage (also runway use agreement has changed. Does this also apply?) *Impacts due to procedure changes and frequency .Qb Other issues we may or may not include, EPA never signed off or1 last one. Do we ask about StART and are they using it for a partial part 150 round table? Document I sent from FAA that we discussed Shawn, I can not thank you enough for taking this on! I am available to you for anything. Sheila 206-501 -9553 of 5/31/19, 12:47 PM
V V