BAC SP #2 Sharyn Parker To Nancy Tosta Re Letter From Port Commission President Tom Albro 20171018 0001

From :Sharyn Parker Wed, Oct 18, 2017 01:12 PM Subject : Port L£tter To : Nancy Tosta Cc : tbbi Wagner , lucyk@burbnwa.gov Helk> indies! Cherall Just finished reading the letter from Tom Albro. Fm surprbed that the Port chairrrnn wouki take the tim to write a three-page, single.spa ad ktter to a little bI advisory cormtttee where he ckarly wants us to change our rdnds about the white paper. He references inaccuracbs, but I dUn see any; although I adntt, I don't have the background thbi has in the area of air pollution. Mr. Albo's "darfiations" are really nothing nme than Port hype and he provkies no in-depth analysis about the whIte paper's so-alled inaccuracbs. CbDital FUnding Sources This paragraph is confusing and contradictory. A PFC b a fee author nd by Congress, but the anDunt and use of the fee (as Mr. Albro later adntts) is set by the Port and is one of the funding sources for noise nttbatk)n. Apparently, the Port has deckled k wont use PFC revenue for infrastructure irTprovenents at the airport facility. ahh b a port poHcy, not dttated by Congress even though he haves that thought lingering as if it were true.) Basically, Mr. Albro does not adequately reveal how the current expansion is being funded. For exanpk, what level of federal funds are anttipated and what are the other fee charges that will be used for expansion purpose? Finally, what are their financial assunpt ions? if their large capital…
V V