BAC SP #2 FAA Part 150 Study Record Of Approval 2013 (4 Th Part 150 Since 1985) 0001

The Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (Sea-Tac) Noise Compatibility Program (NCP) includes measures to abate aircraft noise, control land development, mitigate the impact of noise on non- compatible land uses, and implement and update the program. Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 150 requires that the plan apply to a period of no less than five years into the future, although it may apply to a longer period if the sponsor so desires. The airport sponsor has requested that the program measures be applied to the Future 2018 Noise Exposure Map/Noise Compatibility Program (Exhibit 6-2). The objective of the noise compatibility planning process has been to improve the compatibility between aircraft operations and noise-sensitive land uses in the area, while allowing the airport to continue to serve its role in the community, state, and nation. This NCP is an update to Sea-Tac’s existing program, which the FAA most recently approved in the 2002 Record of Approval (ROA). The recommendations consist of a continuation or modification of some currently approved measures from the 1985, 1994, and 2002 NCP ROAs. It also includes new measures. As outlined in Section 5.1.1 of the NCP, the currently approved Abatement Measures A-2, A-4, A-5, A-6, and A-9 have been completed and are therefore not carried forward in this NCP. Abatement Measures A-7, A-8, A-13, A-14 and A-17 have been withdrawn. Section 5.2.1 provides a review of the currently approved mitigation measures that were included in the 2002 ROA. Mitigation Measures M-1 and M-13 have been…

Open full document

Upcoming Events

PSCAA Advisory Council Meeting Agenda
Add to CalendarMWednesday Mar 11, 9:00am - 11:35am
1904 3rd Avenue, Suite 105, Seattle, WA 98101
Call to order – Roll Call – Quorum Established – Land Acknowledgement We would like to acknowledge that our Agency operates in four present-day counties, which are the traditional lands of the Coast Salish people, past and present. This acknowledgement does not take the place of authentic relationships with indigenous communities in our jurisdiction and [...]