BAC SP #2 A I Reform FAA Industry Data Exposes Greener Skies As An Environmental Fraud 20200729 0001

thIS, to start unaerstanclrng tIre 'tir. nttp://alrelorm .corn/reaa-tnls-tustart-una Read this, to Start Understanding the 'Greener Skies’ Fraud Posted on Click to read an interesting article about the 'Greener Skies’ program fraudulently pushed by FAA, Port of Seattle (POS), and industry, and approved by FM in late 201 2. 'Greener Skies’ was pitched, but it actually never of3 7/29/20. 12:28 PM Read thIS, to start unaers tan(IIng tIle 'tir. nttp://alreIorm.com/ 'tnls-t(bstart- una reatly happened. David Suomi (now FAA Regional Administrator) admitted as much when doing his 4/25/2017 $piel for the Port of Seattle Commissioners. Conspicuously, 'Greener Skies’ was focused ONLY on west-side arrivals. Why? Because if FM had tried to create similar concentrated arrival streams over Bellevue, the entire proposal would have been killed by the residents below. 'Greener Skies’ was supposed to bring enormous impact reductions. TIe key design element was to flow more than half of all Sea- Tac arrivals in over Eltiott Bay, miles from horne s, thus with almost no noise impact. Are they doing that, nearly six years later? No, not at all, not even in light traffic, and not even on clear Fall days perfect for flying. Why are the Elliott Bay arrivals so rare? Because the air traffic controllers have to fit all arrivals together, into the final landing flow; i.e., they need to merge both the west flow (especially the HAWKZ arrivals over Vashon Island) and the east flow (the CH INNS downwinds coming up from the southeast entry post near Mt. Rainier,…
V V